The Price of Apple

From Truth-out.com by James Kwak

Friday 20 January 2012

by: James Kwak, The Baseline Scenario | Op-Ed

Last week, This American Life ran a story about the Chinese factories that produce Apple products (and a lot of the other electronic devices that fill our lives). It featured Mike Daisey, a writer and performer who traveled to Shenzhen, China, to visit the enormous factories (more than 400,000 people work at Foxconn’s, according to the story*) where electronic products are churned out using huge amounts of manual labor.

I’m sure that most of us already realized, on an intellectual level, that the stuff we buy is made by people overseas who, in general, have much less than we do and work harder than we do, under tougher working conditions. It’s harder to ignore, however, listening to Daisey talk about the long shifts (up to thirty-four hours, apparently), the crippling injuries due to repetitive stress or hazardous chemicals, the crammed dormitories, and the authoritarian rules. At one point an interviewee produces a document, produced by the Labor Relations Board (with the name of the Board on it): it’s a list of “troublemakers” who should be fired at once.

The question that Ira Glass asks at the end is how we should feel about all of this. Although Apple is at the center of the story—at one point Daisey shows his iPad to a man whose hand was destroyed by a machine that makes the iPad, and he called it a “thing of magic”—they seem to do a reasonable job of policing their suppliers and insisting on improvements to working conditions, at least compared to other companies. But still the number of violations doesn’t go down from year to year.

Glass quotes Paul Krugman talking about how sweatshops (in Indonesia, I think), though brutal, were still better than the alternative for the people working in them, and how they contributed to economic development. He also interviews Nicholas Kristof, who agrees that working in these factories is often better than working in rice paddies—especially for young women, who can earn more money and thereby improve their bargaining power. But is that enough? Daisey doesn’t think so.

I have a MacBook Pro and an iPad (and an LG phone, and a Samsung monitor, . . .). While I think OS X is far better than Windows (or Linux if, like me, you’re not a power user), I would gladly switch back if I had confidence that my computer’s manufacturer was an appreciably, demonstrably better employer than Foxconn. And I would pay more, too, just like I pay more for free-range eggs and organic food (which I buy for the environmental impact, not the health benefits). But while there are certification programs that provide some confidence that your coffee isn’t the product of imperial exploitation, I’m not aware of such programs for electronics. Maybe there are already, and I just don’t know about them.

Given that anyone buying Apple products is already paying a hefty price premium, you would think at least some of us would rather pay that premium for better labor protections.

* The TAL staff fact-checked everything they could fact-check in the story, and found only one small error (having to do with the size of the cafeterias).

Here is the This American Life story:

Catholic Leaders Challenge Gingrich and Santorum on Divisive Rhetoric Around Race and Poverty

Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum are being called out for their bigotry and racism. We don't need such regressive thinkers and believers in our government now, or ever!!!! The nation needs to go forward, not backward.

From Faithinpubliclife.org on 1-19-12

More than 40 national Catholic leaders and prominent theologians at universities across the country released a strongly worded open letter today urging “our fellow Catholics Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum to stop perpetuating ugly racial stereotypes on the campaign trail.”

In the lead up to Saturday’s primary in South Carolina, Newt Gingrich has frequently blasted President Obama as a “food stamp president” and implied that some African Americans are more content to collect welfare benefits than work. Rick Santorum attracted scrutiny for telling Iowa voters he doesn’t want “to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money.”

The open letter reminds the two presidential candidates, vying for Christian conservative voters, that U.S. Catholic bishops have called racism an “intrinsic evil” and consistently defend vital government programs such as food stamps and unemployment benefits that help struggling Americans.

The full text of the statement and signatories follow.

An Open Letter to Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum

As Catholic leaders who recognize that the moral scandals of racism and poverty remain a blemish on the American soul, we challenge our fellow Catholics Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum to stop perpetuating ugly racial stereotypes on the campaign trail. Mr. Gingrich has frequently attacked President Obama as a “food stamp president” and claimed that African Americans are content to collect welfare benefits rather than pursue employment. Campaigning in Iowa, Mr. Santorum remarked: “I don’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money.” Labeling our nation’s first African-American president with a title that evokes the past myth of “welfare queens” and inflaming other racist caricatures is irresponsible, immoral and unworthy of political leaders.

Some presidential candidates now courting “values voters” seem to have forgotten that defending human life and dignity does not stop with protecting the unborn. We remind Mr. Gingrich and Mr. Santorum that Catholic bishops describe racism as an “intrinsic evil” and consistently defend vital government programs such as food stamps and unemployment benefits that help struggling Americans. At a time when nearly 1 in 6 Americans live in poverty, charities and the free market alone can’t address the urgent needs of our most vulnerable neighbors. And while jobseekers outnumber job openings 4-to-1, suggesting that the unemployed would rather collect benefits than work is misleading and insulting.

As the South Carolina primary approaches, we urge Mr. Gingrich, Mr. Santorum and all presidential candidates to reject the politics of racial division, refrain from offensive rhetoric and unite behind an agenda that promotes racial and economic justice.

Francis X. DoyleAssociate General Secretary
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (retired)

Sisters of Mercy of the Americas Institute Leadership Team:Sisters Patricia McDermott, RSM (President) Eileen Campbell, RSM Anne Curtis, RSM Mary Pat Gavin, RSM Deborah Troillett, RSM

Sister Pat Farrell, OSFPresident
Leadership Conference of Women Religious

Rev. Bryan N. MassingaleAssociate Professor of Theology
Marquette University

Rev. Clete KileyDirector for Immigration Policy
UNITE HERE

Rev. Anthony J. Pogorelc,  M.Div., Ph.D.The Catholic University of America
Institute for Policy Research & Catholic Studies

Rev. David Hollenbach, S.J.University Chair in Human Rights and International Justice
Boston College

Sr. Patricia J. Chappell, SNDdeNExecutive Director, Pax Christi USA

Marie DennisCo-President, Pax Christi International

Rev. John F. Kavanaugh S.J.Professor of Philosophy
St. Louis University

Rev. Jim Keenan, S.J.Founders Professor in Theology
Boston College

Rev. Thomas J. Reese, S.J.Senior Fellow
Woodstock Theological Center
Georgetown University

Sister Mary Ellen HowardExecutive Director
Cabrini Clinic, Detroit

Rev. James E. Hug, S.J.President
Center of Concern

Sister Simone CampbellExecutive Director
NETWORK, A Catholic Social Justice Lobby

Steven SchneckDirector
Institute for Policy Research and Catholic Studies
The Catholic University of America

Sister Karen M. Donahue, RSMJustice Team
Sisters of Mercy West Midwest Community

Sister Mary Ann HinsdaleAssoc. Prof. of Theology
Boston College

Tom AllioCleveland Diocesan Social Action Director (retired)

M. Shawn CopelandAssociate Professor of Theology
Boston College

Sister Maria Riley, OPSenior Advisor
Center of Concern

Todd WhitmoreAssociate Professor
Department of Theology
University of Notre Dame

Terrence W. TilleyAvery Cardinal Dulles, S.J., Professor of Catholic Theology
Chair
Theology Department
Fordham University, Bronx, NY

Michael E. LeeAssociate Professor
Theology Department
Fordham University, Bronx, NY

Paul LakelandAloysius P. Kelley S.J. Professor of Catholic Studies
Director, Center for Catholic Studies Fairfield University

Lisa Sowle CahillMonan Professor of Theology
Boston College

Eric LeCompteBoard Member
Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good

Tobias WinrightAssociate Professor of Theological Ethics
Saint Louis University

Christopher PramukAssistant Professor of Theology
Xavier University, Cincinnati

John SniegockiAssociate Professor of Christian Ethics
Xavier University, Cincinnati

Kathleen Maas WeigertCarolyn Farrell, BVM Professor of Women and Leadership
Loyola University, Chicago

Daniel K. FinnProfessor of Theology and Economics
St. John’s University, Minnesota

Gerald J. BeyerAssociate Professor of Christian Social Ethics
Department of Theology and Religious Studies
Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia

Jeannine Hill FletcherAssociate Professor of Theology
Faculty Director
Dorothy Day Center for Service and Justice
Fordham University, Bronx, NY

Sister Mary Ann HinsdaleAssoc. Prof. of Theology
Boston College

John InglisProfessor and Chair
Department of Philosophy
University of Dayton

Anthony B. SmithAssociate Professor
Department of Religious Studies
University of Dayton

David O’BrienUniversity Professor of Faith and Culture
University of Dayton

William L. PortierMary Ann Spearin Chair of Catholic Theology
University of Dayton

Alex MikulichResearch Fellow
Jesuit Social Research Institute
Loyola University, New Orleans

Susan M. WeisharMigration Specialist
Jesuit Social Research Institute
Loyola University

Kristin HeyerAssociate Professor
Religious Studies
Santa Clara University

James SaltExecutive Director
Catholics United

Vincent MillerProfessor of Religious Studies
University of Dayton

Nancy DallavalleAssociate Professor and Chair
Department of Religious Studies
Fairfield University

Newt Calls Obama Part Of The Democratic Elite

What is hilarious is that Ging da'Grinch had the balls to call Obama an elitist. WOW!! So, what does that make Newt Ging-da'Grinch with his hundreds of thousands of credit just in a jewelry store? His line of credit stinkin' up all over the nation must smell really sweet to elite shopkeepers.

Now we have Millard--the Willard--Romney (a rat by any other name) receiving $374,000 per speaking engagement. Who in their right mind would pay a predator to speak at any event? Maybe other predators!!!

While CEO at Bain, or is it Bane, Capital, the company that gutted smaller companies and businesses for the tax right-offs and its thrill-seeking profiteering experiences, Millard-da'rat-Romney (That is his financial crime syndicate nickname.) set up tax haven investment funds in the Cayman Islands in order to attract other predatory investors to make a lot of money.

Romney reaped $8M in investment wealth from these funds. He claims he pays the 15% investment income tax rate on his pile of cash in those funds. My guess is this, Bain set up the funds in the Caymans in order for the corporation to receive a zero percent tax benefit. No doubt, they have a corporate office in some hotel room in the Cayman Islands. Since they don't pay taxes on their funds, the overall wealth of the fund is much greater than if they formed the fund in Illinois, for example.

This means that the investors get the trickle down effect as a result of a bigger fund pie. Their shares are bigger since the overall fund is larger. More pie for everyone, including Millard da'Willard.

Millard says that, of course, he is interested in cutting his tax liabilities down. That is the Moron way of life!!! When one wears Magic Underwear they feel that they can do just about anything--even run for president and lie to the American people.

(http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com)

Occupy DC Passes Corporate Personhood Resolution; Occupy Pittsburgh

Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

From Huffington Post by Arin Greenwood

WASHINGTON -- Occupy DC's General Assembly passed a "corporate personhood resolution" on Saturday calling for a constitutional amendment ending the "judicial fiction of corporate Constitutional rights."

The resolution calls on Congress to "enact" the amendment (though it should be noted that Congress can't actually enact a Constitutional amendment on its own -- once two-thirds of both houses vote for the amendment, then the states also have to ratify it).

The proposed amendment would also require "Congress to regulate campaign finance" and would mandate "public financing of public elections." The resolution contains other "non-amendment solutions" for untangling money and politics as well:

In 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that independent spending on elections by corporations and other groups could not be limited by government regulations. This decision is only the latest in a long line of judicial rulings that have invented the legal doctrine of corporate personhood, affording corporations the same constitutional rights as people. The corrupting influence of money in politics, exacerbated by corporate personhood, subverts democracy. The Supreme Court has enshrined corporate personhood and interpreted the First Amendment to prohibit Congress from regulating money in politics. The only way to reverse these rulings is an amendment to the Constitution.

We support an amendment that does the following:

Ends the judicial fiction of corporate Constitutional rights.
Requires Congress to regulate campaign finance.
Mandates public financing of public elections.
We also support these non-amendment solutions:

Ending the revolving door between lobbyists and the executive and legislative branches of the government.
Restructuring the Federal Election Commission to give it prosecutorial power and neutral, non-political commissioners.Requiring the disclosure and complete transparency of all independent political expenditures.
Banning lobbyists from acting as either fundraisers or bundlers.
We implore the DC city council, the Maryland legislature, the Virginia legislature and all legislative bodies to pass resolutions calling on Congress to enact an amendment and other solutions.

We call on all people to exercise their civic duty by taking action, where possible, against corporate personhood and the corrupting influence of money in politics without waiting for the government to fix itself.

Occupy DC reserves the right to oppose an amendment or other solution even if it adheres to the provisions above.

Consent to this proposal does not require that an individual be completely in line with every piece of the proposed solution.

This concern is one of many that Occupy DC will address. More solutions are forthcoming.

Occupy DC is planning to participate in "Occupy the Courts," a one-day protest taking place on Friday at the Supreme Court, as well as at other federal courts around the country. Citizens Unitedwas decided on Jan. 21, 2010.

Occupy DC also plans to ask the District of Columbia Council to pass an anti-corporate personhood resolution, similar to the resolutions passed by the New York City Council and the Los Angeles City Council.

Historical sidenote: The last amendment to become part of the U.S. Constitution is the 27th Amendment. This amendment says that if Congress votes to give itself a pay raise, the raise doesn't take effect until the following Congress (in other words, if the 112th Congress votes for a pay raise, the 113th Congress gets the raise). The amendment was first introduced in 1789. It became fully ratified in 1992.

Occupy Pittsburgh is still Occupying!!!


@OccupyPGH 1/16/2012 - Day 94 @The People's Park


Occupy Pittsburgh hereby makes it known that The Bank of New York Mel- lon Corporation (NYSE: BK, hereafter BNY Mellon), a Delaware Corporation, with headquarters at One Wall Street, New York City, New York, is currently occupying a premises at 500 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. We, the people of Pittsburgh, have so far tolerated the presence of this organization on this property, and as for the Occupy Pittsburgh encampment, we have enjoyed a friendly relationship with most of BNY Mellon’s staff, who are almost entirely part of the 99% of society who are not millionaires.


On Friday, December 9, 2011 at approximately 6:30 pm, Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon) posted several notices at the entrances to the People’s Park (BNY Mellon Green) requiring the removal of “all tents and other structures as well as camping equipment and other stored personal items” from BNY Mellon Green by noon on Sunday, December 11, 2011. The notice stated that the presence of these items or overnight camping past this deadline would be considered an unlawful trespass.


Occupy Pittsburgh is  holding a public demonstration in front of the U.S. Steel Tower, 6th and Grant Street, at noon on Wednesday, December 21, 2011, to protest the bilking of millions of dollars from state and local governments and Pittsburgh schools.