VISIT US ON FACEBOOK!

OUR FACEBOOK PAGE--EYE ON WASHINGTON

Stephen Colbert-- Here.

Our "Vintage" Video Collection Click On Image

Our "Vintage" Video Collection Click On Image
Great Political Moments Caught For Your Pleasure
Showing posts with label Martin Luther King Jr and Occupy Wall Street. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martin Luther King Jr and Occupy Wall Street. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Occupy Wall Street: A Generation Of 20-Somethings Airs Its Grievances, Its Frustrations

Since GWB, all we have heard is the mantra that the US worker needs to be retrained for the future decades of new type jobs. So, if this is the case, then stop allowing universities and colleges from educating young people in degree programs that have become irrelevant. Or, bring the jobs back home and allow Americans to those jobs once again!! Or, end the Wall Street fraud of social -financial -sector- welfare free-for-all-the-elite type of arrangement! End this disconnect!!! This has become a fraud against the working classes.

From Huffington Post and Amanda M. Fairbanks 12-7-11


NEW YORK -- Since graduating a year and a half ago from the Rhode Island School of Design, Nate Barchus hasn't shaken a nagging feeling: that he's aimless.
During college, the 23-year-old illustration major had grown accustomed to feeling like a productive member of society. But ever since Barchus got his college degree, prospective employers have told him that his credentials either overqualified or underqualified him for nearly every position he coveted.
Earlier this fall, he relocated to Brooklyn from Winston-Salem, N.C., hoping that a new and larger city might offer better opportunities. But when that plan fell through, the self-described "overeducated and underemployed" Barchus packed up his belongings, and moved off his friend's couch and into lower Manhattan's Zuccotti Park.
"I came here for a job search and was so demoralized by the lack of meaningful jobs that I figured this was a more valuable use of my time," says Barchus, standing in the middle of Zuccotti Park in early November. "Here I am utilizing all of my skills, which is more than I could say about any job I could possibly land right now."
Prior to the early morning raid in mid-November, when the New York Police Department evicted thousands of protesters from Zuccotti Park, Barchus had been living there for six weeks.
By day, he worked as a librarian who tended to the Occupy Wall Street's library of about 5,000 donated books. By night, he participated as a facilitator of the LGBTQ caucus, acclimated to the challenges of living outdoors, and shared a tent with the five other librarians.
Barchus says he can relate to the struggles facing many of his peers. Unable to find work, he is also on the hook for about $25,000 in student loan debt.
"Our futures are on the line because of this overwhelming debt," says Barchus. "Our entire generation is behind the curve and it's been unbelievably devastating."
Barchus sees the physical occupation stage of the Occupy Wall Street movement as particularly appealing to many 20-somethings because it represents a tangible space for activism -- one that many in his generation have read about in history books but had yet to experience firsthand.
"Because we are disproportionately unemployed and a lot of us are sort of wandering around, it was great to have those spaces to bring us together," says Barchus. "Finally, we had a space to talk about what our generation is capable of doing, what our obstacles are, and learning to really find solace in knowing that we aren't alone in the struggles we face each day."
Over the past few months, 20-somethings from around the country have flocked to the Occupy Wall Street movement in droves and have found an outlet for their growing frustrations.
In particular, many current students and recent graduates are enraged over the increasing cost of tuition and rising amounts of student loan debt -- not to mention a dearth of decent job prospects for many of their well-educated and well-credentialed classmates.
According to the "State of Young America," a national poll released in mid-November, young Americans are growing increasingly unsure that they can attain the American Dream. Further, nearly half believe that their generation will be worse off than their parent's generation.
While a majority of the 872 18-to-34-year-olds surveyed still perceived a college degree as a vital pathway to success, many simultaneously reported feeling strapped by the rising cost of college.
In November, the Institute for College Access and Success, an Oakland, Calif.-based non-profit, released its annual report looking at average debt loads. Amid a difficult job market, it found that 2010 graduates owed an average of $25,250 -- with many in their generation struggling to pay off far more.
Though many 20-somethings embarked on their dream of a college education when a decent-paying job was virtually a guaranteed part of the package, the rules have changed, and a new generation is learning to readjust its expectations.
The morning of the Zuccotti Park raid, Barchus had been getting ready to close up the library when massive floodlights suddenly beamed down on the tree-lined park as hundreds of police in riot gear lined its perimeter.
Along with many of his fellow protesters, Barchus gravitated toward the center of the park to lock arms. But rather than face arrest, he moved on to Foley Square just as the sun came up.
Barchus believes the Occupy Movement has the potential to continue, but he returned to Winston-Salem just before Thanksgiving and has now resumed his job search. He's also participating in local activism by helping to conduct facilitation training for Occupy Winston-Salem. Meanwhile, he's also weighing whether to apply to graduate school in public policy. Eventually, he plans to seek public office and advocate on behalf of the 99 percent.
He credits the Occupy movement with revivifying his passion and refocusing his ambition. While he says he does his best to tune out his mother's relentless chorus of "get a job, get a job," Barchus sees a potentially larger victory at stake.
"I think I'll always look back on this and wonder what might have happened had this movement not existed during this very crucial period in my life," says Barchus, who plans to enroll in graduate school if he can stomach the possibility of taking on more debt in order to finish. "In all honesty, it really brought me back to where I needed to be."
AN IDEA, NOT A LOCATION
Occupy Wall Street first swept up Christy Thornton on a balmy Wednesday afternoon in October when she walked out of class at New York University to meet up with thousands of fellow college students in Washington Square Park.
From there, the group moved south on Lafayette Street and later linked up with tens of thousands of other Occupy supporters in Foley Square. The crowd continued snaking its way farther south, ultimately ending up in Zuccotti Park.
Later that night, surrounded by thousands of like-minded protesters, Thornton was hooked.
A 31-year-old Ph.D. student, she had watched the first rumblings of the movement from the sidelines -- by reading blogs and news stories or by scanning friends' Facebook and Twitter feeds.
But after helping to organize NYU's first student-led walkout and illegally marching down the middle of Lafayette Street and ignoring law enforcement officials along the way, Thornton says she forged a deep and abiding commitment to the burgeoning movement.
"At first, I'll admit it, I was skeptical. I didn't think it was possible for this to happen and I didn't know whether very many students would get behind it," she says. "But it was really empowering to be out there that afternoon and first take the street -- to feel that you could actually be a part of helping to change the parameter of political possibility in this country. It was addictive."
Thornton can also relate to the suffocating effects of onerous debt and looming joblessness.
All told, she says she took out about $35,000 in student loans in order to finance her undergraduate and graduate education. She still has about $20,000 left to pay off.
Thornton grew up in a one-parent working class home in rural New Hampshire. As a young child, her mother's meager salary as a restaurant line cook qualified the family for public assistance. Later on, her mother's job as a prison guard provided access to a pension and health insurance.
After high school, Thornton moved to New York to attend Barnard College. She also earned a master's degree from Columbia's School of International and Public Affairs. She's the first in her immediate family to graduate from college, let alone graduate school.
In the two months since participating in her first protest, hardly a day goes by when Thornton isn't engaged in some form of Occupy organizing -- whether planning for an upcoming demonstration, organizing teach-ins as part of the People's University in Washington Square Park, or participating in a working group focused on issues related to higher education and student debt.
"We feel compelled because we're here and Wall Street is here," says Thornton. During a recent three-week stretch, she says she attended an Occupy-related meeting every single day. "It's really inspiring and definitely tiring, but it's still really exciting. Zuccotti Park or not, it's about conceiving of Wall Street as an idea and not a location."
BURDENED BY THEIR OWN LIVES
Earlier this fall, Costas Panagopoulos, a political scientist at Fordham University, wanted to get a handle on who, exactly, had occupied Zuccotti Park. Of the 301 individuals included in a study he conducted, roughly half were between the ages of 18 to 29 years old. Among the rest of the sample, the average age was 34. Panagopoulos found the group remarkably well-educated, with 47 percent having either a four-year degree or a post-graduate degree.
But however educated and engaged the protesters might be, it's unclear how much traction the demonstrations will have going forward. Doug McAdam, a sociology professor at Stanford University, places equal importance on the movement's historical context and unique position in time.
McAdam previously studied young people who participated in Freedom Summer -- the 10-week period in 1964 when civil rights activists, many of them college students, traveled to Mississippi to register black voters. As a result, an overwhelming majority came away from the experience as more politically engaged members of society. McAdam found that it wasn't simply activism alone that mattered to these people. Just as crucial, their participation intersected with the beginning of sixties-era radicalism.
McAdam sees some parallels for Occupy activists now.
"In my lifetime, I can't remember there being a period that seems as ripe for a movement as the present moment," he says. "In many ways, this particular moment looks a lot like a Freedom Summer moment."
But unlike the sixties, when youth activism followed 15 years of unprecedented post-World War II productivity and broad-based income growth, the current environment, McAdam says, is one in which many young people are still content to watch from the sidelines. As the Occupy movement morphs from the physical encampment phase into whatever its next iteration will be, some of its youngest sympathizers are paying close attention to who picks up the mantle, according to more than a dozen young activists interviewed.
"For students, it won't have a long-term impact simply because they went to an Occupy Wall Street demonstration a few times, but because it began a process that carried them in the way that Freedom Summer started a process for the Mississippi volunteers," says McAdam.
Despite the potential for social upheaval, many young people have yet to feel empowered, according to McAdam's observations. "They're watching this unfold and hoping it can develop," he says. "But they're burdened by their own lives and their own fears about the unpredictability of their own futures."
Mikaila Arthur, a professor of sociology at Rhode Island College, recently wrote "Student Activism and Curricular Change in Higher Education." It's about youth activism on college campuses. She sees potentially longer-term implications for some of the student participants in the Occupy movement.
"In some ways, this involvement is helping them to crystallize the notion of the lives they want to live," says Arthur. "It's giving them a chance to question whether maybe life isn't so much about following in the path of a career and a suburban house, but finding a new way to live that enables them to express their values."
When it comes to actionable next steps, the Occupy Student Debt campaign is as clear as any of the demands put forth by the student backers of the Occupy movement.
The debt campaign urges borrowers to begin defaulting on their student loan payments after one million individuals have made a similar pledge. Since going live just over two weeks ago, 2,345 individuals and counting have signed the debtors' pledge.
"Since the first days of the Occupy movement, the agony of student debt has been a constant refrain," Andrew Ross, a professor of social and cultural analysis at NYU, told a crowd gathered in Zuccotti Park in late November.
Ross, a member of the Occupy Wall Street education and empowerment working group, sees his salary as inextricably linked to debt loads hanging like albatrosses around the necks of many of his young students. He thinks the Occupy movement helped shape students' concerns about their debt and encouraged them to speak up about it.
For the time being, Thornton and many other organizers are focused on keeping the momentum alive so that it might survive the winter. She says she envisions public and private college students rallying to make continued linkages between rising tuition, student debt and joblessness.
At the rally in Washington Square Park rally in early November, Thornton stood alongside many of her public and private college peers who had also walked out of class to join a citywide protest. Over and over again, to anyone who would stop and listen, the group called out: "Students and workers, shut the city down."
A MOVEMENT'S ORIGINS -- AND ITS FUTURE
In New York, the student-led portion of the Occupy Wall Street movement began earlier this summer, when students at public colleges began protesting the increasing cost of tuition. As part of a group called New York Students Rising, student activists at the City University of New York and the State University of New York planned a system-wide walkout on Oct. 5.
Word quickly spread to other schools and other cities. In New York, students from the New School, Columbia University and New York University joined the walkout. Almost overnight, a Los Angeles-based grassroots group called Occupy Colleges sprung up. Its aim: to get as many schools in other parts of the country to similarly show their support by walking out of class.
Over the course of the last two months, Occupy Colleges has organized periodic acts of protest as a way of showing solidarity, with students at various campuses coordinating walkouts and teach-ins -- and with student activists now spearheading physical occupations at nearly a dozen college campuses.
Whether protesting $300 annual increases in tuition at Baruch College, a public school, or $50,000 per year debt loads at nearby New York University, a private school, the increasing cost of college is an issue on which public and private college students have found common ground.
At Occidental College in Los Angeles, Guido Girgenti, a 19-year-old sophomore, spent much of the fall helping to organize acts of solidarity in alliance with the Occupy Wall Street movement.
"This is the movement we've been waiting for," says Girgenti, who grew up in a middle-class home in Fort Greene, Brooklyn and chose Occidental after it offered him the most attractive financial aid package.
Despite his relative privilege, Girgenti sees the basic standards of middle-class life -- like owning a house or sending his own children to an elite university -- as less and less of a given. Although he attends a private university, Girgenti feels strongly allied with many of his peers attending nearby public colleges.
"Like myself, a large portion of middle-class private university students are now seeing that their self-interest is deeply entwined with the self-interest of working-class students at public universities and community colleges," he says. "The community college student working two jobs in order to get by is no different than the private college student amassing tens of thousands of dollars of student loan debt in order to graduate."
Girgenti said he thinks the future of the student-led movement hinges upon the acceptance of a shared vision and destiny, especially during a time when many share a collective generational anxiety about the world they're about to inherit.
In addition to helping organize events on campus, Girgenti says he regularly participated in Occupy Los Angeles, until the eviction of protesters last week. Every Saturday, students from eight public and private colleges would gather at City Hall in downtown L.A. to hold cross-campus assemblies. Talk of rising tuition and debt loads frequently ruled the day.
The vision, according to Girgenti, is for the cross-campus network in L.A. to morph into a regional one that eventually expands into a national network. The immediate challenge is to find a new public space where students can continue to meet and organize.
"If we're really going to build a national movement, we have to continue building a coalition of private and public college students to help restore our democracy," says Girgenti, who, in future years, wants to become a full-time, professional organizer. "Students are the ones who are going to push the envelope to do what's right. We're at a stage in our lives where we can take time off to get arrested during acts of civil disobedience, to go to marches, to have the courage and conviction to participate wholeheartedly in this movement."

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Very Powerful Video UC Davis --students are winning!


In this video we witness cowardly cops using over-the-top para-military garbage on innocent young people. They should also have been chanting--"You are the 99%. We are the 99%....")

It is clear that the students in this video won the contest over who is stronger!!! These cowardly cops should be ashamed of themselves. Now, would they pepper-spray their own kids?




From Taibblog hosted in Rolling Stone Magazine:

UC Davis Pepper-Spray Incident Reveals Weakness Up Top
POSTED: November 22, 12:33 PM ET By Matt Taibbi

Was absolutely mesmerized last night watching the viral video of the UC-Davis pepper-spraying. It was totally amazing, simultaneously one of most depressing and inspiring things I’ve seen in many years.

To recap for those who haven’t seen it: police in paramilitary gear line up in front of a group of Occupy protesters peacefully assembled on a quad pathway. Completely unprovoked, police decide to douse the whole group of sitting protesters with pepper spray. There is crying and chaos and panic, but the wheezing protesters sit resolutely in place and refuse to move despite the assault.

Finally, in what to me is the most amazing part, the protesters gather together and move forward shouting “Shame On You! Shame On You!” over and over again. You can literally see the painful truth of those words cutting the resolve of the policemen and forcing them backwards.

Glenn Greenwald’s post at Salon says this far better than I can, but there are undeniable conclusions one can draw from this incident. The main thing is that the frenzied dissolution of due process and individual rights that took took place under George Bush’s watch, and continued uncorrected even when supposed liberal constitutional lawyer Barack Obama took office, has now come full circle and become an important element to the newer political controversy involving domestic/financial corruption and economic injustice.

As Glenn points out, when we militarized our society in response to the global terrorist threat, we created a new psychological atmosphere in which the use of force and military technology became a favored method for dealing with dissent of any kind. As Glenn writes:


The U.S. Government — in the name of Terrorism — has aggressively para-militarized the nation’s domestic police forces by lavishing them with countless military-style weapons and other war-like technologies, training them in war-zone military tactics, and generally imposing a war mentality on them. Arming domestic police forces with para-military weaponry will ensure their systematic use even in the absence of a Terrorist attack on U.S. soil… It’s a very small step to go from supporting the abuse of defenseless detainees (including one’s fellow citizens) to supporting the pepper-spraying and tasering of non-violent political protesters.

Why did that step turn out to be so small? Because of the countless decisions we made in years past to undermine our own attitudes toward the rule of law and individual rights. Every time we looked the other way when the president asked for the right to detain people without trials, to engage in warrantless searches, to eavesdrop on private citizens without even a judge knowing about it, we made it harder to answer the question: What is it we’re actually defending?

In another time, maybe, we might have been able to argue that we were using force to defend the principles of modern Western civilization, that we were "spreading democracy."

Instead, we completely shat upon every principle we ever stood for, stooping to torture and assassination and extrajudicial detention.

From the very start we unleashed those despotic practices on foreigners, whom large pluralities of the population agreed had no rights at all. But then as time went on we started to hear about rendition and extralegal detention cases involving American citizens, too, though a lot of those Americans turned out to be Muslims or Muslim-sympathizers, people with funny names.

And people mostly shrugged at that, of course, just as they shrugged for years at the insane erosion of due process in the world of drug enforcement. People yawned at the no-knock warrants and the devastating parade of new consequences for people with drug convictions (depending on the state, losing the right to vote, to receive educational aid, to live in public housing, to use food stamps, and so on).

They didn’t even care much about the too-innocuously-named new practice of "civil asset forfeiture," in which the state can legally seize the property of anyone, guilty or innocent, who is implicated in a drug investigation – a law that permits the state to unilaterally deem property to be guilty of a crime.

The population mostly blew off these developments, thinking that these issues only concerned the guilty, terrorists, drug dealers, etc. And they didn’t seem to worry very much when word leaked out that the state had struck an astonishingly far-reaching series of new cooperative arrangements with the various private telecommunications industries. Nobody blinked when word came out that the government was now cheerfully pairing up with companies like AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth to monitor our phone and Internet activities.

Who cared? If you don’t have anything to hide, the thinking went, it shouldn’t bother you that the government might be checking your phone records, seeing what sites you’ve been visiting, or quietly distributing armored cars and submachine guns to every ass-end suburban and beyond-suburban police force in America.

We had all of these arguments in the Bush years and it’s nothing new to assert that much of our population made a huge mistake in giving up so many of our basic rights to due process. What’s new is that we’re now seeing the political consequences of those decisions.

Again, when we abandoned our principles in order to use force against terrorists and drug dealers, the answer to the question, What are we defending? started to change.

The original answer, ostensibly, was, "We are defending the peaceful and law-abiding citizens of the United States, their principles, and everything America stands for."

Then after a while it became, "We’re defending the current population of the country, but we can’t defend the principles so much anymore, because they weigh us down in the fight against a ruthless enemy who must be stopped at all costs."

Then finally it became this: “We are defending ourselves, against the citizens who insist on keeping their rights and their principles.”

What happened at UC Davis was the inevitable result of our failure to make sure our government stayed in the business of defending our principles. When we stopped insisting on that relationship with our government, they became something separate from us.

And we are stuck now with this fundamental conflict, whereby most of us are insisting that the law should apply equally to everyone, while the people running this country for years now have been operating according to the completely opposite principle that different people have different rights, and who deserves what protections is a completely subjective matter, determined by those in power, on a case-by-case basis.

Not to belabor the point, but the person who commits fraud to obtain food stamps goes to jail, while the banker who commits fraud for a million-dollar bonus does not. Or if you accept aid in the form of Section-8 housing, the state may insist on its right to conduct warrantless "compliance check" searches of your home at any time – but if you take billions in bailout aid, you do not even have to open your books to the taxpayer who is the de facto owner of your company.

The state wants to retain the power to make these subjective decisions, because being allowed to selectively enforce the law effectively means they have despotic power. And who wants to lose that?

The UC Davis incident crystallized all of this in one horrifying image. Anyone who commits violence against a defenseless person is lost. And the powers that be in this country are lost. They’ve been going down this road for years now, and they no longer stand for anything.

All that tricked-up military gear, with that corny, faux-menacing, over-the-top Spaceballs stormtrooper look that police everywhere seem to favor more and more – all of this is symbolic of the increasingly total lack of ideas behind all that force.

It was bad enough when we made police defend the use of torture and extrajudicial detention. Now they’re being asked to defend mass theft, Lloyd Blankfein’s bailout-paid bonus, the principle of Angelo Mozilo not doing jail time, and 28% credit card interest rates.

How strong can anyone defending those causes be? These people are weak and pathetic, and they’re getting weaker. And boy, are they showing it. Way to gear up with combat helmets and the submachine guns, fellas, to take on a bunch of co-eds sitting Indian-style on a campus quad. Maybe after work you can go break up a game of duck-duck-goose at the local Chuck E Cheese. I’d bring the APC for that one.

Bravo to those kids who hung in there and took it. And bravo for standing up and showing everyone what real strength is. There is no strength without principle. You have it. They lost it. It’s as simple as that.

(http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com)



Thursday, November 17, 2011

Occupy Wall Street Two Month Anniversary: Protesters March To NYC Financial District, Plan Day Of Events

KAREN MATTHEWS   11/17/11 from Huffington Post

NEW YORK — Occupy Wall Street protesters clogged streets and tied up traffic around the U.S. on Thursday to mark two months since the movement's birth and signal they aren't ready to quit, despite the breakup of many of their encampments by police. More than 200 people were arrested, most of them in New York.
The marches were for the most part peaceful, with only scattered clashes between police and demonstrators. Most of the arrests were for blocking streets, the traffic disruptions were brief, and the turnout, at least in New York, fell well short of what police had been expecting.
Chanting "All day, all week, shut down Wall Street," more than 1,000 demonstrators gathered near the New York Stock Exchange and sat down in several intersections. Helmeted police broke up some of the gatherings, and operations at the stock market were not disrupted.
The street demonstration came two days after police cleared 200 people from New York's Zuccotti Park, shutting down the encampment that served as headquarters of the Occupy movement.
"This is a critical moment for the movement given what happened the other night," said Paul Knick, a software engineer from Montclair, N.J., as he marched through the financial district. "It seems like there's a concerted effort to stop the movement, and I'm here to make sure that doesn't happen."
At least 177 people were arrested in New York alone. Some were bloodied during the arrests. One man was taken into custody for throwing liquid, possibly vinegar, into the faces of several police officers, authorities said. Many demonstrators were carrying vinegar as an antidote for pepper spray.
A police officer needed stitches on his hand after he was hit with a piece of thrown glass, police said.
Later, the crowd split up for rallies elsewhere in the city. Some also planned to head into the subways, then march over the Brooklyn Bridge.
In Los Angeles, about 500 sympathizers, many of them union members, marched downtown between the Bank of America tower and Wells Fargo Plaza, chanting, "Banks got bailed out, we got sold out." More than two dozen people were arrested.
Demonstrations were also planned or under way in such cities as Washington, St. Louis and Kansas City, Mo. Police arrested 21 demonstrators in Las Vegas, and 20 were led away in plastic handcuffs in Portland, Ore., for sitting down on a bridge.
In Albany, N.Y., about 250 protesters from Buffalo, Rochester and other encampments arrived by bus to join a demonstration in a downtown park.
The street demonstrations marked two months since the Occupy movement sprang to life in New York on Sept. 17. They were planned well before police raided a number of encampments over the past few days, but were seen by some activists as a way to demonstrate their resolve in the wake of the crackdown.
Thursday's demonstration around Wall Street brought taxis and delivery trucks to a halt, but police were largely effective at keeping the protests confined to just a few blocks. Officers allowed Wall Street workers through the barricades, but only after checking their IDs.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg said police had been expecting as many as 10,000 protesters based on what activists had been saying online. But he said there had been "minimal disruption."
The demonstrators included actor-director Andre Gregory, who said he hoped the movement would lead to national action on economic injustice.
"It's a possible beginning of something positive," he said.
Some onlookers applauded the demonstrators from open windows. Others yelled, "Get a job!"
"I don't understand their logic," said Adam Lieberman, as he struggled to navigate police barricades on his way to work at JPMorgan Chase. "When you go into business, you go into business to make as much money as you can. And that's what banks do. They're trying to make a profit."
Gene Williams, a bond trader, joked that he was "one of the bad guys" but said he empathized with the demonstrators: "The fact of the matter is, there is a schism between the rich and the poor, and it's getting wider."
The confrontations followed early-morning arrests in other cities. In Dallas, police evicted dozens of protesters near City Hall, citing health and safety reasons. Eighteen protesters were arrested. Two demonstrators were arrested and about 20 tents removed at the University of California, Berkeley.
City officials and demonstrators were trying to decide their next step in Philadelphia, where about 100 protesters were ordered on Wednesday to clear out immediately to make way for a long-planned $50 million plaza renovation at City Hall. Union leaders pressed the demonstrators to leave, saying construction jobs were stake.

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Occupy Movement Inventing Little. (But that's Okay)

     I've heard some people calling anyone attached to any part of the current culture and associating with the Occupy Movement to be opportunists. Look, Michael Moore, Susan Sarandon, Unions, have been talking the talk and walking the walk for years. They are far from opportunists, Occupy people are the ones late on the uptake. Richard Trumpka has been fighting corporate greed for 30 years, All the unions have been around for nearly a hundred, but all these students, new deminted worker bees, underemployed college grads, and nardowell old hippy liberals are now facing the new realities caused by the previous 30 year beat down of the social democratic world created by LBJ in the sixties, and are  finally fully getting it.  


     Hey to sit around a cry opportunist on established progressives is like someone calling the Occupy movement a little stupid cause they are just arriving late to the American funeral. Dare I suggest, where they fuck have the occupiers been? Narcoleptically snoring and drooling off the leftover crumbs of corporations since Reagan took office? I digress. 


    To grouse and moan and divide the people is just foolish. Would you call MLK an opportunist? Gloria Steinem? Well they been talking the talk a long long time, so truth is, Occupy hasn't invented anything, its just that the corporations have crossed way over the line now, and cut off the occupiers puny crumbs. The only thing new here is the occupy group for the last 30 years had simple jobs waiting for them, well surprise! Not anymore.  


     Guess what, the people that the occupy settlers are bashing have been vilified by a majority of the political establishment and corporations since time began, so don't go calling anyone opportunists. Unless of course you are a republican troll, and then I get that.  Bottom line, if you are earning wage of any amount, you are the resistance. Bottom line, every person who has to work, or can work has everything at stake.  Carl here!  

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Occupy Wall Street-New Haven CT

From the New Haven Independent

1,000 Launch New Haven’s “Occupation”

BY Thomas MacMillan | OCT 15, 2011
After marching around the center of New Haven, demonstrators allied with the national “Occupy Wall Street” movement gathered on the Green to form a self-governing colony by chanting and singing—and wiggling their fingers in the air.
Finger-wiggling, a sign of agreement, was one of a handful of gestures used by participants at Occupy New Haven, a local branch of the free-form protest movement that is spreading widely from its genesis at Occupy Wall Street in New York City.
The phenomenon is harnessing an outpouring of public sentiment against wealth inequality, corporate power in politics, and economic bailouts for big banks.
The movement took root in New Haven Saturday via the demonstrators who marched around the Green before gathering to establish an “occupation” of indefinite length. Using hand gestures and a crowd-sourced amplification technique of shouting in unison, the protestors held a “general assembly.”
They announced the establishment of 13 different committees, including panels covering sanitation, “direct action,” and sustainability. The occupiers decided to hold at least two assemblies per week, and set up tents and systems for dispersing food and warm clothes to participants.
They were the actions of people who intend to set up camp for quite some time. Todd Sanders, a 20-year-old sophomore at Southern Connecticut State University who helped lead the general assembly, said he plans to occupy the Green for as long as he can. Although he has an apartment in town, he’ll be spending his nights in one of the half-dozen tents pitched under trees in the upper Green, near the corner of Elm and College streets.
Saturday night an estimated 200 or so people were settling in for the first night’s sleep. Police reported no problems.
New Haven’s occupation kicked off at noon with a large march around the Green. Hundreds of all ages turned out for the occasion, sporting signs like “We Are The 99%,” referring to the majority of people not among the wealthiest 1 percent of the population. 
Just past noon, they began to march. Starting at the corner of Elm and College, marchers filled the sidewalk and headed east. The march was so big that as the head of the procession reached Elm and Church, people were just beginning to take up the rear two blocks away.
Mayoral candidate Jeffrey Kerekes and his dog joined the march.
The march headed south, in front of City Hall, then took a right. At the corner of Temple and Chapel, marchers passed hot dog vendor Mike Hardin, who said he hoped to sell some cold drinks.
“Ice cold Snapple!” shouted a marcher.
“Snapple’s not a good company, though. They’re very right-wing!” countered another.
“But it tastes good,” the first marcher replied.






















The march took another right and went up one side of Temple and down the other. The chants were pointed: “Banks got bailed out! We got sold out!”
When the protesters got back to the corner of Elm and Church, they took a second, smaller lap, and the chants morphed into songs, led in part by Pastor Scott Marks (at right in photo).
“Nice day for a walk,” said Lt. Rebecca Sweeney, downtown’s top cop, who was heading up a detail of 11 cops assigned to the event.
As the march wound its way back towards the starting point, it was joined by a small counter-protest of about a dozen young Republicans. “What do we want? We don’t know! When do we want it? Whenever!” they chanted, mocking the amorphous nature of the Occupy Wall Street movement.
“A protest without a point is an aimless mob,” said Yale student Michael Knowles (at left in photo), the group’s leader. He said the counter-protesters are all college Republicans from Fairfield, Quinnipiac and Yale universities. The counter-protest was an attempt to highlight the “incoherence” of the Occupy Wall Street movement, he said, which “doesn’t do anything to effect change.”
Marchers gathered around a park bench, near a handful of tents. Protest “facilitators” introduced the concept of a “mic check,” in which the crowd echoes short statements by a speaker—sort of crowd-sourced public-address system.
As they waited for a “general assembly” to begin, Shamayah Grant said she had come out because “I have a child to take care of and I need health care and I don’t think I should have to pay a lot for it.” She held her 8-month-old daughter, Sa’Rye, in her arms.
Facilitators stood on a bench and kicked off the general assembly with an explanation of hand signals, followed by general announcements, interrupted once or twice by a man drinking a can of Natural Light. “You’re on my bench! I sleep on that bench every night!”
Announcements were followed by “Proposals,” of which there was only one: that a general assembly be held every Sunday and Wednesday.
“Temperature check!” called out Sanders, to gauge the crowd’s opinion on the proposal. Hundreds of waggling fingers went up in the air.
Despite the obviously political nature of the event, most of the general assembly was devoted to matters of logistics and the sharing of information. It was only during the “Soapbox” portion of the event that ideologies emerged. One man took the bench to call for an end to all political lobbying, corporate tax breaks, political action committees, and political donations. Pastor Marks tied the movement to the recent sweep of aldermanic elections by union-backed candidates. A man decried outsized CEO salaries; others called for people to pull their savings out of large banks and put them in credit unions.
As the meeting broke up, facilitator Martina Crouch announced the formation of 13 committees covering everything from sanitation to outreach to medical needs and food.
At the “Comfort” station, clothing donations were already accumulating. They were later put into plastic bags and placed under a canopy donated by the Devil’s Gear bike shop.
Chabaso Bakery donated boxes of bread.
The hundreds of people eventually filtered away, leaving the occupiers who plan to spend the night and the coming days operating as a self-governing outpost on the Green.
Previous Occupy Wall Street/ New Haven coverage:

(http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com)