VISIT US ON FACEBOOK!

OUR FACEBOOK PAGE--EYE ON WASHINGTON

Stephen Colbert-- Here.

Our "Vintage" Video Collection Click On Image

Our "Vintage" Video Collection Click On Image
Great Political Moments Caught For Your Pleasure

Monday, February 21, 2011

President Obama Can No Longer Be Trusted To Tell The Truth!


"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." 
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials.

Hey Barack, don’t let that hopey-changey thing penetrate too deeply into that over inflated psyche of yours now that Egypt has turned the tide of change and hope honestly.

The Egyptians stole your slogan and actually acted upon it. Not like you who bastardized it. You have totally abandoned your message of hope and change that was so inspiringly delivered in the halls of Minnesota.

“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America. I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment that we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth.”

Was he kidding on that day back in 2008 as he spoke in St. Paul when he clinched the Democratic presidential nomination?

Then later, during his State of the Union speech, he said, “We’re the nation that put cars in the driveways and computers in offices; the nation of Edison and the Wright brothers; of Google and Facebook. In America, innovation doesn’t just change our lives. It is how we make our living.”

Those points were true, but most of Americans are either working at low paying jobs, are underemployed, or unemployed, or working part-time, or filling the most recently hired 36,000 service worker jobs spread out around the nation. 36,000 is small potatoes Barack. Is this how we now make our living? Is this the real America, which contradicts the delusional America that you speak about?

The populist revolution that took hold from the ground up, with no leader to march them into the promised land, or through the gates of prosperity was done by oppressed citizens that lived under an autocracy supported by the United States. They did it one person at a time. It was the thousand monkey phenomena being fulfilled. They had patience and determination, as well as a will to win their fight.

I’m sorry Barack, it had nothing to do with your wishy-washy-wordy-thingy that you do. It had nothing to do with your “nicey”, orderly, and genuiney transitiony request of the Dictator from the Nile, Mr. 2011 Pharoah himself, and torturer-in-arms-with the USA, renditiony brother-in-arms that has more than likely disappeared.

This change was a people-thing! It was not done by overweight Cheez Curl eating, recliner sitting, reality t.v. watching sluggish, heart attack-in-waiting under-achieving, flag waving for Glenn Beck sub-literate thinking, and over ego believing American patriots; but, by a group of oppressed Arabs who, once and for all, had enough of the dictatorial, military protected bull-shit. A threshold had been reached, and the people stood with the many in the military, who decided that the best thing for the nation was to escort the Pharoah off of his throne.

From my perspective, I might view you as a Mubarak-lite, in spite of your reign being only 2.5 years long, and Hosni’s beginning during the Reagan period with his dictator loving Ring Around the Hosni and other cozy affairs with Middle Eastern, and Central American dictators.

President Obama believes that dictators deserve an “orderly and genuine transition” when moving the deck chairs all around a sinking Titanic Middle East. He does it here, too, from his Oval Office deck chair. The dictators in the U.S. come from the corporate board rooms, and the pompously decorated elite offices of CEOs, and CFOs of our corporate and financial oligarchs, and keptocrats.

It is singing Koombya  with such palsee-whalesee Tea Party loving Republicans holding their leach collared Democrats at their heels. Republicans love being the Dominatrix’ of the nation.

Having a democracy that serves the best interest of a sustainable society is NOT part of the plan of this American President--Get-hosedkne--Obama. The plan has been to further extend the LilboyBush presidency.

  • We were lied into war and the war criminals are still free, writing books, giving lectures, and making appearances. No large scale investigation of the war, and its planning processes have been independently investigated by a body with legal authority.
  • These two particular wars are draining the nation’s economic resources as they are funneled into the war profiteering machine. One reason the price of oil rises is because the US uses massive amounts of fuel and oil products in the war theaters, as well as during naval battle ship maneuvers, and on the number of bases the military has built around the global. This entire military conglomerate has drained the nation of what it requires to protect its citizens from starvation, freezing to death, illness, domestic jobs development and more.
  • We continue to live under a state of emergency, which was declared, 10 years ago, under the rule of LilBoyBush. Living under such a state of emergency interferes with the flow of a free market, as was pointed out in Washington’s blog piece, “We Cannot Separate Economics and Politics. And Those Who Speak Out Against Bad Policy Are Helping The Economy, 2-8-11. These ongoing lies are destroying our free market, which is decreasing the value of our money, and investing more risky and precarious.
  • We continue handing out basically free money to the bankstas who were responsible for the economic collapse, unemployment, and foreclosures, while the Fed mops up their Treasuries and toxic bonds. None of these bankstas have been forced to testify before a Grand Jury with legal authority, or at the least, expose and make transparent all of their toxic securities (MBS), and the number of foreclosed and abandoned homes that have been returned to them.

Obama SotU: “At stake right now is not who wins the next election -- after all, we just had an election. At stake is whether new jobs and industries take root in this country, or somewhere else. It's whether the hard work and industry of our people is rewarded.”

The new jobs and industries are growing in China, and elsewhere, allowing Walmart to become their supply chain into the US.

ObamaSotU: “Two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up. The economy is growing again.

Thanks to the tax cuts we passed, Americans' paychecks are a little bigger today. Every business can write off the full cost of new investments that they make this year. And these steps, taken by Democrats and Republicans, will grow the economy and add to the more than one million private sector jobs created last year.”

Yes Mr. Obama, Middle America has received little in their paychecks, while the elite have received millions more in their paychecks.

Obama SotU: “And now it's our turn. We know what it takes to compete for the jobs and industries of our time. We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world.”

Why was the nation allowed to fall behind? Why did Congress and presidents allow the corporate elite to sell out and sell off our jobs in the first place?

Barack Obama is engaged in a full out assault against working people as did LilBoyBush. He has abandoned organized and unorganized labor. The organized laborers in Wisconsin are fighting for dear life to retain collective bargaining rights. We are seeing an organized effort by neo-liberals and Tea Bagging Shit-Throwing Republicans funded by labor-hating corporate “Royalists” to bring workers to their knees and become American serfs.

Obama has thrown these supporters under the bus. Be Afraid. Be Afraid people your Medicare, or Medicaid, or Social Security, or your pension are all the reasons why the nation continues to collapse economically. IT IS YOUR FAULT for wanting to save a little money and pay your bills and send your kids to college. IT IS YOUR FAULT for having trust and faith in the system that allowed the American corporation to grow so large that they could become multi-national in strength and power; and in doing so, have benefited hugely from the economic and political Nanny State created for them via laws, patent rules, trade laws, foreign worker exploitation, off-shoring, and tax hiding clauses in the law.

Here is what Dr. Dean Baker wrote in his piece titled Greenspan's Incompetence Badgers Wisconsin's Workers.

“[T]he number of jobs now stands at 7,700,000 below its pre-recession level. Furthermore, no one is projecting that this gap is about to be closed in the next several years.

There should be zero doubt: this downturn is the reason that Wisconsin has a budget crisis. Perhaps Wisconsin's leaders can be blamed for not recognizing that the economy was being managed by complete incompetents - and planning accordingly - but this is the story of the state budget crisis.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the economy is operating at more than 6.4 percentage points below its potential level of output. If Wisconsin's state economy was 6.4 percent larger, and its revenues increased accordingly, it would have more than $4 billion in additional revenue in its coffers over the next two years.

This increase in revenue would easily cover the projected deficit. This is even before we add in the savings from lower payouts for unemployment insurance and other benefits that would follow from a return to normal levels of unemployment. In short, there can be little dispute that Wisconsin's budget crisis is Alan Greenspan's work.

The allegations of the union bashers can easily be shown to be nonsense. Wisconsin's public sector workers are paid no more than their private sector counterparts. They tend to get somewhat better pensions and health care coverage, but this is offset by lower pay for comparably skilled workers. Nor has there been an explosion of public sector employment under the period in which Democrats governed the state [or most other states].

How does it change anything if we know that Greenspan (last seen being feted at the Brookings Institution) is the real villain in the Wisconsin budget crisis? First, it should turn the heat where it belongs: Washington.

The problem of the downturn is a lack of demand. A lack of demand is solved by spending money. We have to get our elected representatives to ignore the shrill whining of the Wall Street deficit hawks. We need sufficient stimulus from the public sector to overcome the falloff of more than $1.2 trillion in spending from the private sector that resulted from the collapse of the housing bubble.

If members of Congress are too intimidated to do what is needed to fix the economy, then Wisconsin's [and all other state] legislators should do what common sense dictates: follow the money. Rather than taking pay and benefits from schoolteachers and firefighters, it makes sense to take money from the people who have it. This means taxing Wisconsin's wealthy and its corporations. The tax increase only needs to be temporary, since the state budget should be fine once the economy recovers.

Of course the wealthy and the corporations will claim that they will leave the state and stop hiring, but these are not people who are known for their truthfulness. They are known for their money.

If these big winners in the downturn are forced to share more of their wealth until the economy recovers, then maybe they will put more pressure on Congress to support the sort of stimulus needed to get the economy back on track. This would be a real win-win for just about everyone.” 

In Washington’s Blog piece he brings up a very important point of view when examining the well-being of a political system. When our representatives, president, military, justice department, congress have broken the circle of trust they must deliver to its citizens, then our economy, our political system, and our social fabric can no longer maintain its integrity.

This is what was written: “Being able to trust people might seem like a pleasant luxury, but economists are starting to believe that it’s rather more important than that. Trust is about more than whether you can leave your house unlocked; it is responsible for the difference between the richest countries and the poorest.

Above all, trust enables people to do business with each other. Doing business is what creates wealth….Confidence is like the gasoline, without it the machine won’t move.

Trust is gone: there is no longer trust between counterparties in the financial system. Furthermore, confidence is at a low. Investors have lost their confidence in the ability of shares to provide decent returns (since they haven’t).

As trust declines, so does Americans’ willingness to invest their money in the financial system….Public distrust of bankers and financial markets has risen dramatically with the financial crisis. [The] loss of trust in the financial system played a critical role in the collapse of economic activity that followed. To undo the damage, financial regulation needs to focus on restoring that trust.

Dr. Baker went on to dispel the Be Afraid of Entitlements in his piece The President as Storyteller-in-Chief.

The center-right story centers on government excess: large budget deficits, overpaid public employees and bloated government social programs. Just as was the case with President Reagan's stories, these stories are not true.
The large budget deficits were an outcome of the crisis: Tax collections plummeted and spending on countercyclical programs like unemployment insurance rose. The deficits in the years preceding the crisis were actually relatively small when measured against the size of the economy.
[W]e have the story of out-of-control social programs. There are a number of programs focused on helping low-income people that even collectively don't amount to a hill of beans in terms of the total budget. We can stop paying for nutrition for poor children or buying heating oil for low-income seniors, but even zeroing out these programs entirely barely makes a dent in the budget.
Then we have the universal programs, like Social Security and Medicare. These programs cost a lot of money, but people are willing to pay for them. Furthermore, the story of exploding growth in these "entitlements" stems entirely from our broken health care system.
If per person health care costs in the United States were the same as in any other wealthy country, we would be looking at enormous budget surpluses, not deficits. Everyone in Washington knows this, but they are scared of the drug companies, the insurance companies, the doctors' lobbies and other powerful interest groups, so instead they push for cutting these essential programs.
In short, the center-right story's can easily be shown to be nonsense. However, President Obama has put up nothing to counter it. He has backed away from telling the public the truth: The country faces an enormous economic hole right now because the financial industry ran wild over the last decade and the Fed and other government regulators let them.
It would not be difficult to come up with salacious images of people like Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide or Robert Rubin of Citigroup living the good life, while tens of millions of people suffer unemployment and/or foreclosures because of the fallout from their greed. President Obama could also highlight the incredible incompetence of top economic officials like Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke, who let the $8 trillion housing bubble grow unchecked.
This would provide a compelling and truthful narrative to focus the nation's attention. Polls consistently show that the public has an intense dislike of Wall Street. What better place to direct people's anger than on those who are actually responsible for the economic crisis?
However, President Obama has opted to go in a different direction. He has instead embraced the false narrative pushed by the center-right, actually implying the problem is somehow out-of-control government spending, as though the housing bubble was not the source of the economic crisis. This may endear him to the Wall Street crew, but this narrative is a disaster for those who care about putting people back to work, providing workers with a secure retirement, and protecting the gains that unions have helped to secure for workers in both the public and private sector.”

Unfortunately, the public’s trust in government as a whole, the justice system, bankers, and the corporate media are at all-time lows. Why? Because the government has been caught lying. The government repeatedly said about the subprime crisis, banking crisis, debt crisis, mortgage crisis, and other economic crises [are contained and under control. And, that our experts in government and in the Fed are going to fix it]. It wasn’t, and they didn’t…and so, the people have lost trust in the government.” (Washington’s blog piece noted.)

The piece went on to say that it isn’t just the economic crisis that has caused a breech of trust, but it goes deeper. There was a lack of honesty and truth surrounding 9/11: weapons of mass destruction, that it was unforeseeable; that government doesn’t spy on its own people; it doesn’t torture, or engage in rendition with dictators; the citizens haven’t seen honest and non-partial investigations around any of these overwhelming factors that impact our nation and the trust of our representatives.

Abusive financial practices have gone unchecked and the individuals responsible for them have actually been rewarded instead of prosecuted. “The public will need to hold the perpetrators of the economic disaster responsible, [and] will have to see proof that government and business leaders can behave responsibly before they will trust them again.” (Washingtonsblog.com)

Yet, today our president continues to surround himself with those who have been within the circle of those responsible for our financial disaster while he repeatedly wants us to believe that they can be trusted to repair a system that is collapsing from within.

Obama has said to us that his “mission has to be to accelerate hiring and accelerate growth.” How when tax cuts to the rich, two wars continue, outsourcing is the norm, and the bankstas have been recapitalized and the upper 10% have had a wealth resurrection? I don’t trust his words.

Obama has brought on even more banksta people. William Daley, the son of the late Mayor Daley of Chicago--one of the biggest mayoral machine-makers in history. William Daley, is now Obama’s Chief of Staff. He came from JPMorgan Chase, as a chief operational officer. His job was to push government away from regulation and reform, and he ignored the dangers that would eventually come from unbridled corporate power.

Professor Michael Hudson wrote in Obama’s New Chief of Staff Sought to Loosen Post-Enron Corporate Reforms, “It makes you pause when you see people who worked in the banks that caused the problems---people who lobbied for positions that would have done even greater damage to the economy---being recycled into government.” (Rheingold, Center for Public Integrity).

Daley pushed for Sarbanes-Oxley to be made more impotent, and hoped to see greater protections for corporate auditors by making it harder to sue or investigate them. He also worked inside the Clinton administration, therefore, is one of those Clintonestas who helped bring about NAFTA and other destructive worker policies we refer to as neo-liberal.

Even in 2007, he was against excessive oversight in the world of international markets, which doesn’t sound like he was supportive of domestic workers getting protections from these neo-liberal policies.

Daley also spent three years at SBC Communications, which acquired AT&T. And, “when White Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel called a top JPMorgan executive to ask for the bank’s support in creating a new consumer-protection agency, the executive---former Commerce Secretary [under Clinton] William Daley---said no, according [to as source].”

Other Clintonestas surrounding Obama are Gene Sperling, economic overseer, and budget director Jacob Lew.

When Americans see that President Obama works his hardest to hire those who were involved in practices that helped destroy our economic, which is not recovering for tens of millions of working and unemployed people, there is nothing else we can feel but that our trust has been killed. This is why many of us fully relate to the populist revolutionary movement choreographed by the Egyptian people, and which is now spreading to Libya, Yemen, Bahrain, and all points global.

It is unlikely to happen here because too many are fattened up on Cheez Curls and to engrossed by fantasy television, while enjoying their self-loathing Social Security and Medicare checks.

President Obama has turned his back on real reform and the average working American and the retirees, who worked to make this nation great. He has turned to face the Rightwingers, Tea Partiers, and corporate oligarchs. There is no reason to trust a single word he speaks. The lame duck is now walking badly.

Thanks for reading, jerry
http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com 

Monday, February 7, 2011

Most Current Concerns Surrounding the Gulf of Mexico

http://washingtonsblog.com     has posted a great piece on the most current information about the Gulf of Mexico and the problems that still exist.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/02/meanwhile-back-in-other-gulf.html

Of course, BP had ties and hand shakes with Mubarak.

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com


Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Max Keiser Interviews James Howard Kunstler About Peak Oil

(If the video does not stop scrolling, try moving the video time circle ahead.)










(You can see video one on MaxKeiser.com)

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

The Palin Doctrine

The Palin Doctrine appears to be steeped in narcissism and self-delusion with principles that bond her misinformed followers whose minds cannot be changed by facts to her like frightened insects afraid of the Bug Zapper.

She has now been anointed with a jeweled crown along with the knighted title of Queen of Narcissism. She won’t back down or accept her contribution to Arizona’s politically based shooting spree.

One cannot deny that the shooting spree was political, since the shooter had it planned to assassinate this Democrat because of his political viewpoints, that contradicted her own, and which paralleled those of Rightwingers, such as his hatred for big government, and how the nation went astray when going off the gold standard.

How ironic that is since it was President Richard Nixon who took the country off the gold standard and submersed us into a fiat currency printed through the Federal Reserve as a way to pay for the Vietnam War. Don’t raise taxes to pay for wars, buddy boy! Just print money and issue bonds to sell to foreigners. Pay for wars through debt, say all presidents that followed Nixon.

The Palin-drone went on the attack when interviewed by Sean Hannity, a footman for the Queen. She tried to weasel away from criticism of her Bulls-Eye map and sloganisms by saying that her “aim” was at the ballot box. I don’t believe Jared Loughner had the ballot box in mind.

This is from the Los Angeles Times 1-10-11, By Sam Quinones and Scott Kraft:

“Loughner had purchased a 9-millimeter Glock semiautomatic pistol at a Sportsman's Warehouse in Tucson five weeks ago, and investigators who searched his home over the weekend said they found, hidden in a safe, two key pieces of evidence — a letter from Giffords thanking Loughner for attending one of her Congress on Your Corner events in August 2007 and an envelope that bore the handwritten phrases "I planned ahead" and "My assassination," the name "Giffords" and what appeared to be Loughner's signature.”

I believe the message was perfectly clear—to kill Giffords!

The Palindrome spoke about her innocence in this shooting spree/assassination plot and then turned it on Democrats by essentially saying they have no morals.

Here is Palin’s answer to Hannity’s question of when did she realize she was being connected to the tragedy. It is also interesting that Hannity calls Palin, Governor Palin, when she never completed her term as governor. Actually, she is a Governor Dropout.

Palin: Well, right away, unfortunately, and not just me. And this isn't about me. And my response, four days after this horrendous event, and in my response I talked about defending those who were innocent, had nothing to do with the shooting. And my defense wasn't self defense, it was defending those who were falsely accused.”

Here she tries to disconnect herself from her symbolic connection.

Here is more. Here she shows how she and her Reichwing comrades are also victims of the shooting. She includes her Tea Party folks, Hannity, Limbaugh and the other members of her stochastic terror-like media cabal.

“…and soon, the entire state of Arizona was being falsely accused of somehow being accessories to this horrendous, horrendous crime.”

Here she shifts her self-delusional-I-am-an-innocent-too view to her ‘where in the world did the media come up with this shooting as a politically based shooting.

“That is why I was puzzled, at first, as to why, before facts were even gathered -- why it would be that the mainstream media would start accusing and using such a tragedy for what appeared to be, right off the bat, some political gain.”

She has gone from sympathizing and empathizing with the victims of the tragedy by making New Testament references, and such, to her spinning the interview toward an attack and shift away from her toward the Left. Hannity gave her a segue into it by introducing Robert F. Kennedy’s remarks calling her a merchant of hate because of use of crosshairs on her “target list”.

“And, again, that's [crosshair bull’s eye target used on her map” not original. In fact, Democrats have been using it for years. In fact, Bob Beckel, I believe that he had bragged on your show, Sean, that he is the one who invented these crosshairs or these targets. So, you know, that came up right away, that, oh, it must be a cause of this horrendous evil act of this shooter, that perhaps he saw that map and that incited him towards violence, which, of course, is ridiculous. Again, it's not an original use of an icon or a graphic.”

Here is another deflection or culpability because maybe in the past someone else might have used that icon or graphic, yet, she dismisses it even though an Arizona Democrat was targeted on her map and was then chosen by Jared to kill. No coincidence here is her assessment and conclusion.

Here she minimizes the affect it had on people viewing her bull’s eye target on her PAC site, which was removed by her site manager. “And, I don't think that that was inappropriate. If it was going to cause much heartburn and even more controversy, I didn't have a problem with it being taken down.”

Causes much heartburn? I believe the relationship between the targeting of Ms. Giffords on The Palin-drone PAC map and the killings is a bit worse than heartburn!!!!

Here comes the COGNITIVE DISONANCE out of the shallow, narcissistic brain of this Wasilla defect.

“But screenshots, of course, have been taken of that. And I don't know if the Democrats have taken down theirs in these ensuing days, but, again, knowing that that had absolutely nothing to do with an apolitical or perhaps even left-leaning criminal who killed these innocents and injured so many, I didn't have a problem with it being taken down if, in fact, it actually has been taken down.”

Again, she takes facts that are too painful to hear and creates misinformation by linking the words: Left-leaning criminal who killed innocents and injured so many, and apolitical, when in fact, Jared had Rightwing political views that drove him to kill at the Safeway. (Safeway? Maybe, it was an unsafeway.)

Here they elaborate on the Democratic Leadership Council’s Bob Beckel usage of targets to attack Republicans. See this about the difference between crosshairs and DLC usage.

Hannity says: “Governor, you mentioned earlier the DLC has used this. Bob Beckel did say this; Pat Caddell, a Democrat, over the years has said this -- this is a DLC map we are looking at in the screen here, a bull's-eye map targeting districts, and it says it right there, targeting strategy. All these war analogies. Clinton's had a war room. It's very common in politics. Why do you think you were singled out and the left singled you out in this, Governor?”

Here we see Cognitive Dissonance being used by Hannity to make fiction into fact. What was used at the DLC looked like a crossbow paper target to identify a specific state that was Republican and needed to be worked on. There were absolutely no politicians labeled or listed on this map, but that did not matter to the “fiction-to-fact-fabricators”.

Here Palin’s paranoia comes through that it is about her message and that the country is on the wrong track, and how she must prevail no matter what!!! Here she wants us to believe that her message is filled with time-tested truths; and, that while being the messenger, her message is attempting to be destroyed.

“I know that it isn't about me personally, but it is about the message that I am not hesitant at all to spread across this country. And that is that our country is on the wrong track. We've got to get put back on the right track, and we have to elect those officials who can adopt and enact policy to allow us to be prosperous and healthy and safe again. And I know that a lot of those on the left hate my message, and they will do all they can to stop me because they don't like the message. But, again, we know that it's not just me. It's all who seem to embrace the time-tested truths that helped build our country. They do not like to hear that message. And, as many of them have promised to do, they'll do what they can to destroy the message and the messenger.”

Here she name drops Martin Luther King, and moves the discussion on to herself. Here she believes there are forces trying to shut her up. Here is her self-delusion that she is just “lil ole me”, when in fact, she is a media Hindenburg. If anything, she will explode by her doing.

“So, in a situation like we have just faced in these last eight days of being falsely accused of being accessory to murder, I and others need to make sure that we, too, are shedding truth -- shedding light on truth so that a lie cannot continue to live. Because if a lie does live, then, of course, your career is over, your reputation is thrashed and you will be ineffective in what it is that you are trying to do. So, I will continue to speak out. They're not going to shut me up. They're not going to shut you up or Rush or Mark Levin or Tea Party patriots or those who, as I say, respectfully and patriotically petition their government for change. They can't make us sit down and shut up. And if they ever were to succeed in doing that, then our republic will be destroyed. Not necessarily me being sat down and shut up, but having the voice of respectful dissent being shut up. That would destroy our republic.”

Here she blows again:

“We know violence isn't the answer. When we take up our arms, we're talking about our vote. We're talking about being involved in a contested primary like this and picking the right candidate, too, John McCain. We thank you for that.
But this B.S. coming from the lame stream media lately about this... about us inciting violence. Don't let -- don't let the conversation be diverted. Don't let a distraction like that get you off track. Keep fighting hard for these candidates, who are all about the common sense conservative solutions that we need.”

Here again, The Palin-drone flies over the scene claiming her own victimization.

Hannity: “Do you receive, Governor, a lot of death threats?

I receive a lot of death threats. My children do. That's the worst part of it, as you can imagine.”

 “Well, I have repeated over and over my condemnation of violence and specifically trying to explain that when we talk about being up in arms, we're talking about getting to the voting booth in -- in a democracy within our republic. We want to make sure that we're exercising our right to vote. That is our arms. But that was frustrating. I think the most frustrating part of this has been the accusation that I and others, upon responding to false accusations of being involved in murder, that we have interjected ourselves into the story.”

Now comes here attack of the Left:

“I think they're -- the hypocrisy there is so glaring and the double standards. I mean it reminds me that those on the left if it weren't for their double standards, they'd have no standards. So it -- it's almost, really, a waste of time to even address their hypocrisy.”

Hannity asks her about the term “blood libel”, and this is her answer, while never fully explaining why she used such a provocative and explosive term after such a tragedy. Then, she begins to shift away from herself toward the blaming of Congress for not getting to work on the issues that plague this nation, which she believes are more important than her having to explain herself.

“I don't know how the heck they would know if whether I did or didn't know the term "blood libel," nobody has ever asked me. And "blood libel" obviously means being falsely accused of having blood on your hands. And in this case that's exactly what was going on. And yes, the historical knowledge that people have of the term "blood libel," it goes back to the Jews who were falsely accused back in medieval European times of using the blood of children. And you know, the criticism of even the timing of this statement is being used as another diversion, because I believe that there are many on the left, many critics, who don't want, for instance, Congress, to buckle down, get back to work.

“There's this trifecta thing going on in our country right now that's going to bring America to her knees if Congress doesn't start addressing the issues at hand. That being our growing debt, a looming energy crisis if we don't start domestically developing our resources, and some of the national security policies that have been adopted and enacted, like the signing and the ratification of the START treaty that Russia's Duma won't even ratify because there are misinterpretations of what the preamble means. So, we have these things going on right now that have got to be addressed, and Congress has got to get back to work. And it's just much easier, I believe, for critics of common-sense conservative agenda to try to divert and distract from the issues at hand, those tasks that must be addressed today.”

That is the meat of the interview. But there is more to this analysis. It has to do with the psychology behind the Palin mind.

In a piece by Stephen Dufrechou called “Are We Too Dumb for Democracy? The Logic Behind Self-Delusion, 12-19-10, Alternet.org, he says “when faced with facts that do not fit seamlessly into our individual belief systems, our minds automatically reject (or backfire) the presented facts.”

Here is a paragraph that describes Palin when plural words in the Dufrechou piece are removed and Palin descriptor words are interjected with [ ].

“In light of these findings, researchers concluded that a defense mechanism, which they labeled “backfire”, was preventing individuals from producing pure rational thought. The result is a self-delusion that appears so regularly in normal thinking that we fail to detect it in ourselves, and often in others: When faced with faced with facts that do not fit seamlessly into [her] individual belief systems, [her mind] automatically reject[s] (or backfire[s]) the presented facts. The result of backfire is that [she] become[s] even more entrenched in [her] beliefs, even if those beliefs are totally or partially false.”

The author concludes the following, “[F]acts often do not determine our beliefs, but rather our beliefs (usually non-rational beliefs) determine the facts that we accept. “

Maybe Palin bases her opinions on her own beliefs, which may have an uneasy relationship with real facts. (Adapted from a reference in the piece from a Boston Globe article.)

In describing “Cognitive Dissonance”, “when our lynch pins are disturbed, our psychologies are shaken. Psychoanalysts explain that, when this cognitive dissonance does occur, [when there are challenges to facts that conflict with our ideology, the tendency is for that individual to experience feelings of anxiety, dread, and frustration. When these psychologies that hold our ideologies together come apart that is what is called Cognitive Dissonance] the result is to ‘externalize’ the sudden negative feelings outward, in the form of anger, or resentment, and then to ‘project’ this anger onto the person that initially presents the set of backfired facts to begin with. This non-rational eruption of anger or resentment is what psychoanalysts call “de-sublimation”. And it is at the point of de-sublimation, when the disavowal/backfire mechanism is triggered as a defense against the cognitive dissonance.”

“The final step occurs when the person, who offered the toxic facts, is then non-rationally demonized.”

This is how Sarah Palin functions. This is how her dysfunctional, and delusional mind works. This is The Palin-drone in action; or, is it The Palindrome in action.

Did she go on the Hannity show in order to gain solidarity with her fellow stochastic terror-like cabal-mate? Does she, and the others, use the mass media communications network “to stir up random lone wolves to carry out violent or terroristic acts that are statistically predictable but individually unpredictable?”

So, decide for yourselves where this Grisly Mama is coming from. I have it figured out already.

Thanks for reading, jerry
http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com
















Friday, January 14, 2011

More On the Huffington Post Censors Commentators To Articles Posted

Around 24 after I posted my original "Huffington Post Censors Commentators To Articles Posted" piece, I received an email from them. Here it is:


Hello,

The topic of censorship you mentioned in your blog entry http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com/2011/01/huffington-post-censors-commentators-to.html was brought to my attention.

I investigated your claim and found that a technical glitch identified your website URL improperly as a different URL that had been properly banned from our site. Therefore, since you include your URL at the bottom of each of your comments, they were all removed. 

I have temporarily removed the bad link that was causing the problem, in order to allow your comments to pass through the moderation process properly. I have also submitted a tech ticket to get the problem fixed on a permanent basis. Finally, I will be undertaking a review of your most recent comments to publish those that are acceptable. If there is another user name other than "jerrypl" that has been affected, please send it to me and I will review those comments as well. 

I apologize for the problem, and hope that this resolves your issue. For the record, you can best get help with situations like this by emailing us at community-support@huffingtonpost.com or techtips@huffingtonpost.com in the future.

Thanks,


Stephanie H.
User Support Specialist
Huffington Post Moderation Team


*****************************************

The above email was sent to me on 1-9-11 (Monday), yet it appears that only a fraction of my comments to pieces written on Huffington Post have been allowed to be posted, the remaining continue to be reviewed by the commentator.

Stephanie H., as of this date, has not published any of those comments I made that were censored.

Here are this week's comments that Huffington Post censored. This opening quote was what prefixed my comments written.

This [these] comment is [are] pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.”
( I failed to copy and post my comment before hitting the “post comment” on HuffPo.)

Why is Limbaugh still allowed to remain on the air spewing lies and propaganda when such garbage is filled with hate and more? His propaganda message is to spin the shooter's support of Democrats.

The fact remains that Jareed killed Democrats, and nearly killed a Democratic Congresspe­rson. Not only that she is a Jew and so were a few others.

Here is the analogy we learned in school, Rush----Ja­reed hated government­. Radical Rightwing Republican­s often rail against government and it being too big, and that the government has too many working people within it. Democrats don't make this their message.

Therefore, Jareed=bad government­=Radical Rightwing Republican­s.
He also had a belief that we should be returning to the gold standard, as does Texas Republican Congressma­n Ron Paul. I don't hear that from Democrats. It comes mostly from the Right.

"But when was it less heated?  Back in those "calm days" when political figures literally settled their differences with dueling pistols?" HUH? Those were the calm days? "Those days" was a period in time when our nation was less civilized, Sarah. The government went forward and massacred millions of Native Americans for land. Those were the days when two people angry or dishonored battled it out, and sometimes with pistols. What has occurred with Sarah Palin was that she decided to target, and aim her sights at opponents that had a different political viewpoint. SHE PURSUED THE DUELING, NOT HER OPPONENTS! She has the 'blood libel" on her hands, as she calls it. What we have her is a narcissistic--you-are-wrong-not-me- and-THEY-are-out-to-get-me candidate for the Republican party.
She claims that Jared was apolitical!!!! No Sarah. He was political. He shot and killed Jews, and Democrats, as well as a child. He was angry over government, which is the message that many Republicans shared with him. Republicans often soapbox about "government is the problem and not the solution", and that the US needs to go back on the gold standard.
Sarah is trying to deflect the real story here. One, she used toxic and vile rhetoric to rally her Republican base to "aim" and "target" her Bull's Eyed opponents, which could insight a mentally unstable and deranged person to follow through with her message.

Morning Joe showed some guts to call out The Beckesta for being an "Insighter" of hate, and anger

Yes, Rep. Cleaver is correct. And, there will be hoards of Democrats who will not vote in 2012 because they realize that Obama has turned his back on progressiv­e issues, and capitulate­d too much with the Republicon­s. He abandoned a public option, he caved into allowing the mega-banks to steal from the government as they traded toxic mortgages, which they refused to write-down­, with the Fed and in return received near free cash to speculate on Wall Street stalling a real economy, and manipulati­ng world currencies­.

Rep. Cleaver is right. The real unemployme­nt and underemplo­yment figures, based upon Shadowstat­s.com, shows that we are now over 20% with those figures. This will not get better. Jobs in service, burger flipper-li­ke places, maids, etc are not sustainabl­e, good paying jobs that raise up middle and lower income workers.

Rep. Cleaver is right, because Obama has handed over his cabinet to Wall Street.
Obama will have a tough time getting re-elected­. He already handed the mid-terms to the Republicon­s.

With 'Blood Libel,' The 2012 Campaign Has Begun First Posted: 01/12/11 by howard fineman
When one has in the political arena a deeply narcissistic, toxic "grisly (not grizzly) mama" out to "target, and aim" others in order to further the Christian nation, extreme rightwing agenda, then what is created is Sarah Palin.
Her "blood Libel"--is really "blood simple" in that she believes in the hunting down of a mainstream, open minded political debate

Why should we expect anything else from the righwing's psychopathetics who have infiltrated the Republicon party with a wink and a nod.

Katla McGlynn 
First Posted: 01-12-11
When America elevates the most incompeten­t, narcissist­ic and ignorant citizens up upon the political stage, as with Palin, it becomes very likely they will set themselves aflame using a can of their own vile, toxic juices.


thanks for reading, jerry
http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com