VISIT US ON FACEBOOK!

OUR FACEBOOK PAGE--EYE ON WASHINGTON

Stephen Colbert-- Here.

Our "Vintage" Video Collection Click On Image

Our "Vintage" Video Collection Click On Image
Great Political Moments Caught For Your Pleasure

Monday, October 10, 2011

It Has Become Occupy Everywhere!!!

Occupy Doylestown (PA)

DoylestownThey're gonna occupy... where?




Posted: Monday, October 10, 2011 6:15 pm | Updated: 8:21 pm, Mon Oct 10, 2011.
They have occupied Wall Street, Washington, D.C. and Philadelphia.
And now they plan to "Occupy Doylestown."
And Newtown. And possibly Lansdale, Morristown, New Hope, Perkasie, Sellersville, Souderton and Willow Grove.
They say they are part of the 99 percent of people who are "getting kicked out of (their) homes," "forced to choose between groceries and rent," "suffering from environmental pollution," "working long hours for little pay, if (they're) working at all," and "getting nothing while the other 1 percent get everything." They are angry because they feel like their elected representatives listen more to the 1 percent than to them.
And they want to be heard.
Marlene Pray, a community activist and Doylestown Council candidate who is helping to organize the Occupy Doylestown rally, said the organizers want "people in the suburbs and people in communities like Doylestown to know that this economic crisis is impacting your friends, your families, your co-workers, people who stand next to you in the grocery store, people who are waiting for hours next to you in the pediatrician's office."
They want elected officials to "take responsibility for the corruption that exists throughout the political system," Pray said. "Every level of government needs to pay attention to the occupy movement."
Pray said Occupy Doylestown is a small part of the larger Occupy Wall Street movement.
The movement started in July when Adbusters, a Vancouver-based anti-consumerist magazine, called for "redeemers, rebels and radicals" to "occupy Wall Street, the financial Gomorrah of America" for several months.
The call to action demanded that "Barack Obama ordain a Presidential Commission tasked with ending the influence money has over our representatives in Washington. It's time for DEMOCRACY NOT CORPORATOCRACY, we're doomed without it... If we hang in there, 20,000-strong, week after week against every police and National Guard effort to expel us from Wall Street, it would be impossible for Obama to ignore us. Our government would be forced to choose publicly between the will of the people and the lucre of the corporations."
The occupation of Wall Street began on Sept. 17. About 1,000 people participated on the first day.
The occupation has continued and spread to other cities, including Los Angeles and Boston, in the past few weeks.
Occupy Philadelphia has become one of the largest rallies outside of New York City. Protesters gathered Thursday outside of City Hall, and continued their rally throughout the weekend. Hundreds of protesters marched from a makeshift camp outside City Hall to the Liberty Bell on Saturday.
More than 1,200 rallies are planned in cities and towns around the world this month.
PennAction, the BuxMont Coalition for Peace Action and the National Campaign to Protect Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are holding a "Rally for Jobs Not War, Main Street Not Wall Street" outside of Congressman Michael Fitzpatrick's Newtown office on Wednesday. A press release from PennAction said the participants will ask Fitzpatrick to support the American Jobs Act; defend Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid; and reduce military spending by 25 percent.
Occupy Doylestown will be held Thursday near the intersection of State and Main streets.
And the "Occupy Together" page on Meetup.com shows that occupation rallies are planned, but not scheduled yet in Feasterville, Lansdale, Levittown, New Hope, Perkasie, Sellersville, Souderton and Willow Grove.
Pray acknowledged that Doylestown seems, to many people, to be a community that is insulated from the recession. But, she said, quoting former Florida Congressman Alan Grayson, "I think the national statistics of 24 million people who can't find a full-time job, 50 million who cannot see a doctor when they're sick, 47 million who need government help in order to feed themselves, 15 million families who owe more on their mortgage than the value of their home... Those are big numbers. They include people in Doylestown."
Pray said more people than ever before are getting food from the food pantry in New Britain.
"It certainly is important that small towns like Doylestown are given a voice in this struggle," Pray said.
Pray said she and the other organizers of the Occupy Doylestown rally also want to support and honor local businesses at the rally on Thursday, and celebrate local elected officials because "many people feel our local government in Doylestown is accessible."
Christina Kristofic: 215-345-3079; email, ckristofic@phillyburbs.com; Twitter, @CKristofic

Occupy Wall Street... mansions

 @CNNMoney October 10, 2011: 



NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Occupy Wall Street is on the move ... uptown.
Why uptown? Because that's where the rich folks live!
Organizers are planning a march on Tuesday that will visit the homes of JP Morgan Chase (JPMFortune 500) CEO Jamie Dimon, billionaire David Koch, hedge fund honcho John Paulson, Howard Milstein, and News Corp (NWSAFortune 500) CEO Rupert Murdoch.
The millionaires and billionaires are being targeted for what event organizers called a "willingness to hoard wealth at the expense of the 99%."
So far, protesters have not strayed too far from downtown, where a home base of sorts has been established at Zuccotti Park.
Tuesday's march -- organized by UnitedNY, the Strong Economy for All Coalition, the Working Families Party and New York Communities for Change -- will cover quite a bit of ground if successful.
The itinerary calls for protesters to hop on the subway, emerging at 59th street near Central Park, where they will start their tour just after noon.
Doug Forand, a spokesman for the groups, said that the protesters do not have a permit for the march, but were not planning on obstructing traffic and would stick to the sidewalks.
Organizers declined to estimate how many protesters would attend. A Facebook event page dedicated to the march had a modest number of confirmed attendees. Less than 100 people said they would attend as of 6 p.m. Monday.
Earlier Monday, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg -- also a billionaire -- said that Occupy Wall Street protesters could stay in Zuccotti Park indefinitely, so long as they obeyed the rules.
"The bottom line is people want to express themselves, and as long as they obey the laws, we'll allow them to," Bloomberg said. To top of page

The Occupy movement comes to Oakland

(10-10) 17:15 PDT OAKLAND -- Hundreds of protesters poured into Oakland's Frank Ogawa Plaza this afternoon, joining a multi-city movement taking aim at economic inequality and corporate excess.
Teachers, nurses, families and the unemployed participated in the Occupy Oakland protest, carrying signs in front of an empty City Hall. The city offices were closed for a furlough day.
Asia Patterson, a 69-year-old, part-time convenience store clerk, showed up at the start of the 4 p.m. protest, saying he was marching in the name of his nephews, nieces and cousins who had been laid off.
"I need to get up and let my voice be heard," he said. "We have allowed the financial industry to get off the hook with their gambling. I'm fed up with it."
The protest followed the lead of Occupy Wall Street, Occupy SF and similar movement in other cities, where protesters have camped out to voice a wide range of economic concerns.
Taking a cue from other Occupy events, the Oakland protest organizers emphasized that they had no specific demands or even a cohesive message, save perhaps a unified frustration with the status quo.
"While we have much in common, we believe the people are stronger united behind many banners, rather than a single one," according to the website occupyoakland.org, which promoted the protest. "We want to make it very clear that Occupy Oakland is not putting forward leaders, tactical or strategic directives, or a uniform message or political platform."
The Oakland banners included one that read, "I'm a white guy and even I'm not getting a fair deal."
Another read, "Sweden still has millionaires," an apparent reference to the potential coexistence of socialism and profit.
Pam Smith, an Oakland veterinarian, said she was encouraged by the large turnout despite the daylong light rain.
"There seems to be an increasing awareness of these problems, of corporate profits coming before people's basic needs like jobs, health care, homes and education," said Smith, 51. "We need to fix the favoritism in government that favors corporations."
Police were at the scene monitoring the protest. It was unclear if any participants planned to follow protesters in other cities in setting up encampments.
E-mail the reporters at mkuruvila@sfchronicle.com and jtucker@sfchronicle.com.

In the 10 days since the Occupy DC movement sprung up in McPherson Square, it has grown from a handful of protesters waving cardboard signs along K Street to an encampment similar to what’s in Zuccotti Park, where Occupy Wall Street protesters have lived since September 17.
Occupy DC now has food tables where volunteers dish up donated food, a library area, a media center and a “comfort station” piled with blankets. More than 100 attend the groups’ twice-daily general assembly meetings. Dozens have spent the night in the downtown square on air mattresses and sleeping bags and showing up for daily protest marches to the White House and elsewhere around the District.
Occupy DC does not have a permit to occupy the square, but so far, they said, police have left them alone.
“No one has any plans to ask for a permit — or to leave,” said Legba Carrefour, a self-described anarchist and participant. “We haven’t had any problems with police. So far they seem content to let us stay here.”
Carrefour said that they would embrace the other protesters who have been “occupying” Freedom Plaza since Thursday, should they decamp to McPherson Square because their permit expired.
Rooj Alwazir, 23, a District resident, joined the protests last week, and says she feels that the message of economic populism is catching fire, especially among her peers — other twentysomethings facing staggering student debt and scant job prospects.
A 2009 graduate of Marymount University in Arlington, Alwazir has been looking for a marketing job for eight months ever since her last position was downsized. She says she sends out 7 to 10 resumes and applications a day and has still come up empty.
“This movement was bound to happen,” she said. “People in our generation are frustrated... they should be demanding their rights and getting their rights. They feel really empowered by what’s going on.”
By   |  04:15 PM ET, 10/10/2011 

Published October 10, 2011 | FoxNews.com
Rep. John Lewis is one of 435 members of the House interminably frustrated by the arcane ways of the Senate. At an Occupy Atlanta protest, he encountered a process arguably worse.
A lengthy video posted online over the weekend showed what happened when the Democratic congressman tried to address an "assembly" of protesters in his home state. Instead of giving the floor to a man who is not just a longtime U.S. representative but a revered civil rights icon, the protesters employed a tangle of parliamentary procedures to ultimately prevent him from speaking.
A stunned Lewis could be seen watching the whole thing unfold before ambling away.
The procedures they used -- rather, invented -- would make the Senate blush. Imagine some combination of Model U.N., Lord of the Flies and a Phish concert.
The central premise, it appeared, was that no one person is inherently more valuable than anyone else. So when the group's leader, a bespectacled man with a bullhorn, said anything, he spoke in clipped fragments so the rest of the crowd could repeat what he was saying back to him. Another rule -- no clapping, because "clapping can prevent someone else who is addressing the assembly from being heard."
Instead, the leader urged everyone to use effusive hand signals to show approval.
With these fundamentals in place, the assembly spent 10 minutes debating whether Lewis should be allowed to speak before the crowd, which had gathered as one of many offshoots of the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York.

Anonymous Briefly Disrupts Traffic to NYSE Site: Report

By Chao Deng From The Street.com



NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Online activist organization Anonymous reportedly disrupted traffic to the NYSE's website briefly on Monday.
The Chicago Tribune said NYSE.com was sluggish and eventually unavailable between 3.35 p.m. and 3:37 p.m. The report also noted confirmation from a NYSE spokesman that trading had not been impacted.
The hacker activist group Anonymous had posted aYouTube video declaring a "war" against the New York Stock Exchange's Web site on Columbus Day at 3:30 p.m. ET.
"On October 10th, NYSE shall be erased from the internet. On October 10th, expect a day that shall never ever be forgot... Wall Street, expect us," the video said.
Anonymous has created trouble on the sites of MasterCard and Visa in the past by overwhelming the sites with large volumes of traffic in a tactic called distributed denial of service, or DDoS. The group is calling its threat against the NYSE Web site an extension of the "Occupy Wall Street" movement.
Ray Pellecchia, a spokesman for NYSE Euronext, declined to comment on security issues.
The last time a U.S. stock exchange got hit by hackers was in February 2011, when the Nasdaq acknowledged it found suspicious files on its online Web site, Director Desk, which allows company boards to share private information. Unlike that attack, however, Anonymous isn't calling for a direct security breach.
-- Written by Chao Deng and Melinda Peer in New York.

Photos: Occupy Portland largest 'Occupy' event to date 

PORTLAND, Ore. --  Officials in Phoenix are watching other cities across the U.S. as they prepare for the Occupy Phoenix protests, which are scheduled to begin October 15.
Protests were held in several major cities around the country last week, the largest being in Portland, Oregon.  Protesters started gathering just after noon on Thursday at Portland's Waterfront Park beneath the Burnside Bridge. At around 2:30 p.m., thousands walked city streets to Pioneer Courthouse Square, which they occupied for about an hour before marching through city streets to two city parks.
"The corporations have taken our futures away from us and we're just not going to stand by and let that happen," one protester told a reporter from KGW.
"We are not the problem," another man said. "The problems are the bankers on Wall Street that destroyed this economy."
The protest prompted complaints from some business leaders. Many opted to close early due to the rally. Others, like the downtown Apple store, stayed open but workers were urged to skip their breaks and stay inside.  Wells Fargo Bank hired extra security officers over concerns it could be a target.
"If you listen to their conversations, there's no real leadership. They're leading by committee so understanding what they want or are are trying to achieve, I don't think anyone does right now," said William Palmer, chairman of the downtown retail council.
TriMet briefly halted Green and Yellow MAX service along the Portland Transit Mall on 5th and 6th avenues, due to the protesters.
The occupation protest is inspired by the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations, now in their third week, which have spurred other similar demonstrations in major cities like Boston and Los Angeles, all to protest corporate greed.
By Thursday afternoon, nearly 7,000 people had "liked" the Occupy Portland Facebook page. A similar page for Occupy Salem noted that people plan to take over a park next to the Capitol Monday.
In New York, 700 people were arrested over the weekend marching over the Brooklyn Bridge. The protesters range from college students worried about their job prospects to middle-age workers who have been recently terminated.


Occupy Wall Street protests spread to Houston

Students, Houstonians gather to rally peacefully against ‘1 percent’

By Brian Jensen
The 99-percenter movement reached Houston this Thursday in the form of Occupy Houston — a grassroots movement which is “dedicated to ending the corporate corruption of democracy,” according to occupyhouston.org.
The protest began with a meet and greet in Market Square Park and continued with a march to JPMorgan Chase Tower before reaching its final destination at City Hall. All protestors were then given a chance to address the crowd, which repeated the message in order to amplify the volume without a permit.
Estimates of Thursday’s attendance ranged from 200 to 400 protestors, with many carrying signs displaying slogans ranging from “Reinstate Glass Steagall” and “Burn Your Credit Cards” to “I will believe corporations are people when Texas executes one” and “Bail Out Students, Not Banksters.”
UH was represented by members of many student groups including the International Socialist Organization, People Against Corporate Tax Evasion, Fair Labor Action Committee and Students for a Democratic Society. Other activist groups present included Houston Freethinkers, Houston Peace News and Infowars.com.
The protest was also heavily attended by the local media, including Fox, NBC, CultureMap, Houston Chronicle, WB and a helicopter from ABC 13.
When asked what the message of the occupation movement was, a spokesperson said it was “catalyzed around our frustration with corporate excess” as well as bailouts and lack of accountability among corporate CEOs, who she said “have swindled billions of Americans’ dollars and ruined their lives.”
She also encouraged all UH students who want to participate to join the discussion at occupyhouston.org.
Friday’s continued occupation brought local politicians Phillip Andrews and KP George, who were running on a grassroots platform that refuses special interest contributions.
Andrews, who is running for US Representative for House District 7, said “the day you start taking money from special interests, you stop serving the people.”
There have been no problems between the protestors and the police as of Friday according to one of the 10 Houston police officers monitoring Friday’s occupation. One officer went so far as to raise his arms in solidarity, which was loudly cheered by the protestors, as they marched to the JPMorgan Chase Tower.
Despite the recent bouts of rain, Occupy Houston is still active and holding general assemblies in which anyone is free to be heard.
Though numbers are down from the initial protest on Thursday, there are no plans to end the protest until demands are met.

'Occupy Cleveland' growing in size and numbers

CLEVELAND - A small town is starting to form on Public Square in Cleveland. The protesters that call themselves, “Occupy Cleveland,” have been in downtown Cleveland since last Thursday protesting everything from corporate greed to the way the United States government is operating.
The protesters have set up on the sidewalk on West Roadway on the outer edge of Public Square. The area is surrounded by homemade signs hanging on a rope tied to trees. Inside the rope and signs, the protesters have set up a few tables with food that has been donated, sleeping bags and blankets and even a laptop with Internet access to push their message to social media.
The whole point, organizers said, of Occupy Cleveland is to make downtown their "home." They said they will not leave until they see some change in America.
They have permits from city officials until October 17, 2011. Then, they will have to re-apply for more permits. So far, they have had very peaceful demonstrations and said they have not seen much resistance from the public or police.
The group said it hopes to get national recognition as more groups gather to demonstrate in other cites around America. The Cleveland group said its goal, as a whole, is to make the change they said America desperately needs for a better future.





Occupy Wall Street-Boston Continues

From MyFoxBoston


Occupy Boston continues to protest

Updated: Monday, 10 Oct 2011, 9:40 AM EDT
Published : Monday, 10 Oct 2011, 7:24 AM EDT
BOSTON (FOX25 / MyFoxBoston.com) - It is week two for the protestors on the Greenway in Boston and there is no plan to call it quits.
Even the Mayor hasn't said when he'll clear all the tents out  although he can do it at anytime because the group never got a permit to be there.
"As long as they're law abiding, let's work together" said the Mayor.
Last week, an Occupy Boston representative told FOX 25’s VB that they could stay through the winter .
Protestors have combined several issues together and that's one of the things they're being criticized for. There's a lack of focus in their fight, but a few of the issues that stand out are the role Wall Street and big corporations play in American politics, and the lack of the jobs.
"I believe we all have the right to the American dream....for that to happen" a protester told FOX25.
The group is using solar panels to power certain things, but they're also using power outlets at the park, which is the city's electricity. They are also using other city resources like trash pick up and clean up, and police officers are being paid overtime with your tax dollars.
More people are expected to take part today. Local college students are supposed to march thru downtown at 1:30 p.m. and hundreds of people with The MassUniting Coalition, plan to march from Dewey Sq to the Charlestown Bridge at 3 p.m. this afternoon.

(http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com)

Financial Giants Put New York City Cops On Their Payroll


From Counterpunch.org (Donate to this website. It is fantastic.)

Who Do the White Shirt Police Report to at Occupy Wall Street Protests?


by PAM MARTENS 10-10-11
Videos are springing up across the internet showing uniformed members of the New York Police Department in white shirts (as opposed to the typical NYPD blue uniforms) pepper spraying and brutalizing peaceful, nonthreatening protestors attempting to take part in the Occupy Wall Street marches.  Corporate media are reporting that these white shirts are police supervisors as opposed to rank and file.  Recently discovered documents suggest something else may be at work.
If you’re a Wall Street behemoth, there are endless opportunities to privatize profits and socialize losses beyond collecting trillions of dollars in bailouts from taxpayers.  One of the ingenious methods that has remained below the public’s radar was started by the Rudy Giuliani administration in New York City in 1998.  It’s called the Paid Detail Unit and it allows the New York Stock Exchange and Wall Street corporations, including those repeatedly charged with crimes, to order up a flank of New York’s finest with the ease of dialing the deli for a pastrami on rye.
The corporations pay an average of $37 an hour (no medical, no pension benefit, no overtime pay) for a member of the NYPD, with gun, handcuffs and the ability to arrest.  The officer is indemnified by the taxpayer, not the corporation.
New York City gets a 10 percent administrative fee on top of the $37 per hour paid to the police.  The City’s 2011 budget called for $1,184,000 in Paid Detail fees, meaning private corporations were paying  wages of $11.8 million to police participating in the Paid Detail Unit.  The program has more than doubled in revenue to the city since 2002.
The taxpayer has paid for the training of the rent-a-cop, his uniform and gun, and will pick up the legal tab for lawsuits stemming from the police personnel following illegal instructions from its corporate master.  Lawsuits have already sprung up from the program.
When the program was first rolled out, one insightful member of the NYPD posted the following on a forum: “… regarding the officer working for, and being paid by, some of the richest people and organizations in the City, if not the world, enforcing the mandates of the private employer, and in effect, allowing the officer to become the Praetorian Guard of the elite of the City. And now corruption is no longer a problem. Who are they kidding?”
Just this year, the Department of Justice revealed serious problems with the Paid Detail unit of the New Orleans Police Department.  Now corruption probes are snowballing at NOPD, revealing cash payments to police in the Paid Detail and members of the department setting up limited liability corporations to run upwards of $250,000 in Paid Detail work billed to the city.
When the infamously mismanaged Wall Street firm, Lehman Brothers, collapsed on September 15, 2008, its bankruptcy filings in 2009 showed it owed money to 21 members of the NYPD’s Paid Detail Unit.  (A phone call and email request to the NYPD for information on which Wall Street firms participate in the program were not responded to.  The police unions appear to have only scant information about the program.)
Other Wall Street firms that are known to have used the Paid Detail include Goldman Sachs, the World Financial Center complex which houses financial firms, and the New York Stock Exchange.
The New York Stock Exchange is the building in front of which the Occupy Wall Street protesters have unsuccessfully tried to protest, being herded behind metal barricades, clubbed with night sticks, kicked in the face and carted off to jail rather than permit the last plantation in America to be defiled with citizen chants and posters.  (A sample of those politically inconvenient posters and chants: “The corrupt are afraid of us; the honest support us; the heroic join us”; “Tell me what democracy looks like, this is what democracy looks like”; “I’ll believe a corporation is a person when Texas executes one.” The last sign refers to the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, giving corporations First Amendment personhood, which allows them to spend unlimited amounts of money in elections.)
On September 8, 2004, Robert Britz, then President and Co-Chief Operating Officer of the New York Stock Exchange, testified as follows to the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services:
 “…we have implemented new hiring standards requiring former law enforcement or military backgrounds for the security staff…We have established a 24-hour NYPD Paid Detail monitoring the perimeter of the data centers…We have implemented traffic control and vehicle screening at the checkpoints. We have installed fixed protective planters and movable vehicle barriers.”
Military backgrounds; paid NYPD 24-7; checkpoints; vehicle barriers?  It might be insightful to recall that the New York Stock Exchange originally traded stocks with a handshake under a Buttonwood tree in the open air on Wall Street.
In his testimony, the NYSE executive Britz states that “we” did this or that while describing functions that clearly belong to the City of New York.  The New York Stock Exchange at that time had not yet gone public and was owned by those who had purchased seats on the exchange – primarily, the largest firms on Wall Street.   Did the NYSE simply give itself police powers to barricade streets and set up checkpoints with rented cops?  How about clubbing protesters on the sidewalk?
Just six months before NYSE executive Britz’ testimony to a congressional committee, his organization was being sued in the Supreme Court of New York County for illegally taking over public streets with no authority to do so. This action had crippled the business of a parking garage, Wall Street Garage Parking Corp., the plaintiff in the case.  Judge Walter  Tolub said in his opinion that
“…a private entity, the New York Stock Exchange, has assumed responsibility for the patrol and maintenance of truck blockades located at seven intersections surrounding the NYSE…no formal authority appears to have been given to the NYSE to maintain these blockades and/or conduct security searches at these checkpoints…the closure of these intersections by the NYSE is tantamount to a public nuisance…The NYSE has yet to provide this court with any evidence of an agreement giving them the authority to maintain the security perimeter and/or conduct the searches that their private security force conducts daily.  As such, the NYSE’s actions are unlawful and may be enjoined as they violate plaintiff’s civil rights as a private citizen.”
The case was appealed, the ruling overturned, and sent back to the same Judge who had no choice but to dismiss the case on the appellate ruling that the plaintiff had suffered no greater harm than the community at large.  Does everyone in lower Manhattan own a parking garage that is losing its customer base because the roads are blocked to the garage?
Some believe that Wall Street is given special privileges and protection because New York City’s Mayor Michael Bloomberg owes his $18.1 billion in wealth (yes, he’s that 1 percent the 99 percent are protesting) to Wall Street.  The Mayor was previously a trader for Salomon Brothers, the investment bank made famous for attempting to rig the U.S. Treasury market in two-year notes.
The Mayor’s business empire which bears his name, includes the awesome Bloomberg terminal, a computer that houses enormous pricing data for stocks and bonds, research, news, charting functions and much more.  There are currently an estimated 290,000 of these terminals on Wall Street trading floors around the globe, generating approximately $1500 in rental fees per terminal per month.  That’s a cool $435 million a month or $5.2 billion a year, the cash cow of the Bloomberg businesses.
The Bloomberg businesses are run independently from the Mayor but he certainly knows that his terminal is a core component of his wealth.  Nonetheless, the Mayor is not Wall Street’s patsy.  Bloomberg Publishing is frequently in the forefront of exposing fraud on Wall Street such as the 2001 tome “The Pied Pipers of Wall Street” by Benjamin Mark Cole,  which exposed the practice of releasing fraudulent stock research to the public.  Bloomberg News was responsible for court action that forced the Federal Reserve to release the details of what it did with trillions of dollars in taxpayer bailouts to Wall Street firms, hedge funds and foreign banks.
Police Commissioner Ray Kelly may also have a soft spot for Wall Street.  He was formerly Senior Managing Director of Global Corporate Security at Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., the Wall Street firm that collapsed into the arms of JPMorgan in March of 2008.
There has also been a bizarre revolving door between the Wall Street millionaires and the NYPD at times.  One of the most puzzling career moves was made by Stephen L. Hammerman.  He left a hefty compensation package as Vice Chairman of Merrill Lynch & Co. in 2002 to work as Deputy Commissioner of Legal Matters for the NYPD from 2002 to 2004.  That move had everyone on Wall Street scratching their head at the time.  Merrill collapsed into the arms of Bank of America on September 15, 2008, the same date that Lehman went under.
Wall Street is not the only sector renting cops in Manhattan.  Department stores, parks, commercial banks and landmarks like Rockefeller Center, Jacob Javits Center and St. Patrick’s Cathedral have also participated in the Paid Detail Unit, according to insiders.  But Wall Street is the only sector that runs a private justice system where its crimes are herded off to secret arbitration tribunals, has sucked on the public teat to the tune of trillions of dollars, escaped prosecution for the financial collapse, and can put an armed municipal force on the sidewalk to intimidate public protestors seeking a realignment of their democracy.
We may be learning a lot more in the future about the tactics Wall Street and the NYPD have deployed against the Occupy Wall Street protestors.  The highly regarded Partnership for Civil Justice Fund has filed a class action lawsuit over the approximately 700 arrests made on the Brooklyn Bridge on October 1.  The formal complaint and related information is  available at the organization’s web site,www.JusticeOnLine.org.
The organization was founded by Carl Messineo and Mara Verheyden-Hilliard.  The Washington Post has called them “the constitutional sheriffs for a new protest generation.”
The suit names Mayor Bloomberg, Police Commissioner Kelly, the City of New York, 30 unnamed members of the NYPD, and, provocatively, 10 unnamed law enforcement officers not employed by the NYPD.
The lawsuit lays out  dwhat has been curtailing the constitutional rights of protestors for a very long time in New York City.
“As seen in the movements for social change in the Middle East and Europe, all movements for social justice, jobs, and democracy need room to breathe and grow and it is imperative that there be a halt to law enforcement actions used to shut down mass assembly and free expression of the people seeking to redress grievances…
“After escorting and leading a group of demonstrators and others well out onto the Brooklyn Bridge roadway, the NYPD suddenly and without warning curtailed further forward movement, blocked the ability of persons to leave the Bridge from the rear, and arrested hundreds of protestors in the absence of probable cause.  This was a form of entrapment, both illegal and physical.
“That the trap and detain mass arrest was a command-level-driven intentional and calculated police operation is evidenced by the fact that the law enforcement officials who led the demonstration across the bridge were command officials, known as ‘white shirts.’ ”
In April 2001, I was arrested and incarcerated by the NYPD while peacefully handing out flyers on a public sidewalk outside of the Citigroup shareholders meeting – flyers that warned of growing corruption inside the company. (The unlawful merger of Travelers Group and Citibank created Citigroup and resulted in the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, the depression era investor protection legislation that barred depositor banks from merging with high-risk Wall Street firms.  Many of us from social justice groups in New York City had protested against the repeal but were out maneuvered by Wall Street’s political pawns in Washington.)
Out of a group of about two dozen protestors from the National Organization for Women in New York City, Rain Forest Action Network, and Inner City Press, I was the only person arrested.  There was no civil disobedience occurring.  Rain Forest Action Network was handing out fortune cookies with prescient warnings about Citigroup and urging pedestrians to cut up their Citibank credit cards.  The rest of us were peacefully handing out flyers.
Chained to a metal bar inside the police precinct, I was grilled on any crimes I might know about.  I responded that the only crimes I knew about were listed on the flyer and apparently, in New York City, one gets arrested for disclosing crimes by Wall Street firms.
A mysterious, mature, white shirted inspector who ordered my arrest on the sidewalk, and refused to give his first name, disappeared from the police report when it was filed, blaming the arrest instead on a young police officer.  Citigroup is only alive today because the Federal government inserted a feeding tube into Citigroup and infused over $2 trillion in loans, direct investment and guarantees as the company veered toward collapse.
The NYPD at the time of my arrest was run by Bernard Kerik – the man President George W. Bush later sent to Iraq to be the interim Interior Minister and train Iraqi police.  The President subsequently nominated Kerik to head the Department of Homeland Security for the entire nation.  The nation was spared of that eventuality only because of an illegal nanny popping up.  Today, Kerik is serving a four year sentence in Federal prison for a variety of criminal acts.
The New York Civil Liberties Union filed a Federal lawsuit on my behalf  (Martens v. Giuliani) and we learned that the NYPD had arbitrarily established a policy to arrest and hold for 72 hours any person protesting in a group of 20 or more.   The case was settled for a modest monetary award and the repeal by the NYPD of this unconstitutional and despicable practice.
Pam Martens worked on Wall Street for 21 years. She spent the last decade of her career advocating against Wall Street’s private justice system, which keeps its crimes shielded from public courtrooms.  She has been writing on public interest issues for CounterPunch since retiring in 2006.   She has no security position, long or short, in any company mentioned in this article.  She can be reached at pamk741@aol.com
(http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com)

Chicago's 'Occupy' Protest Issues Specific Demands


CHICAGO—The local spin-off of the Occupy Wall Street protests born in Manhattan released 12 proposed demands during the weekend, some of the first specifics to emerge from collection of groups that have sprung up in recent weeks across the U.S.
Occupy Chicago, an independent group inspired by the New York protests, which take aim at corporations and the wealthy, appear to be the first in the movement to adopt official demands: Repeal the Bush tax cuts and prosecute "Wall Street criminals." At an open meeting Saturday in downtown Chicago, nine-tenths of the nearly 300 present voted to adopt those demands.
This week, the group plans to vote on other proposed demands, which include giving the Securities and Exchange Commission more regulatory power, forgiving student debt, reforming campaign-finance law and enacting the so-called Buffett Rule, a White House proposal to prevent millionaires from paying lower tax rates than middle-class Americans.
Occupy Wall Street has taken flak for not announcing specific demands in a protest that has engulfed sections of lower Manhattan and is now entering its fourth week. Bill Dobbs, a member of the Occupy Wall Street press committee, said he doesn't know of plans to adopt specific demands.
"I mean, I've got my own set of demands," he said. But "all our energy is going to ringing the alarm bells about economic conditions in this country."
Evelyn DeHais of Occupy Chicago said it became clear in early meetings that policy reform would be a part of the protests here.
"People wanted to talk about what real change can be made," said Ms. DeHais, who, with 20 others, condensed hundreds of suggestions from protesters into the group's proposed list of 12. She said she disagrees with some of the demands, "but that's the point. It's not about what one person believes. It's making sure the entire group is being spoken for."
Mr. Dobbs said his group isn't formally affiliated with the hundreds of copycat protests that have sprouted across the nation, "but we're really happy people are protesting.…There's mutual respect with our brothers and sisters in Chicago."
Occupy Seattle has posted 52 proposed demands on its website, asking people to vote on each. The proposals are less specific than Occupy Chicago's, such as "tax the rich and big business." Some are more radical, such as "nationalize the banks."
Other lists of proposed demands have circulated on the Internet, but none appear to have formal ties to the Occupy protest groups.
In Chicago, where protesters have occupied the sidewalks outside the Federal Reserve Bank for 17 days, the protests gained momentum during the weekend. The Rev. Jesse Jackson spoke at a Friday night meeting, and hundreds turned out for marches through downtown Saturday in conjunction with a long-planned anti-war protest.
Write to Jack Nicas at jack.nicas@wsj.com

Panic of the Plutocrats-Paul Krugman writes in the NYT

10-9-11 Op-Ed page. (Link here.)


"It remains to be seen whether the Occupy Wall Street protests will change America’s direction. Yet the protests have already elicited a remarkably hysterical reaction from Wall Street, the super-rich in general, and politicians and pundits who reliably serve the interests of the wealthiest hundredth of a percent. 
And this reaction tells you something important — namely, that the extremists threatening American values are what F.D.R. called “economic royalists,” not the people camping in Zuccotti Park.
Consider first how Republican politicians have portrayed the modest-sized if growing demonstrations, which have involved some confrontations with the police — confrontations that seem to have involved a lot of police overreaction — but nothing one could call a riot. And there has in fact been nothing so far to match the behavior of Tea Party crowds in the summer of 2009.
Nonetheless, Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, has denounced “mobs” and “the pitting of Americans against Americans.” The G.O.P. presidential candidates have weighed in, with Mitt Romney accusing the protesters of waging “class warfare,” while Herman Cain calls them “anti-American.” My favorite, however, is Senator Rand Paul, who for some reason worries that the protesters will start seizing iPads, because they believe rich people don’t deserve to have them.
Michael Bloomberg, New York’s mayor and a financial-industry titan in his own right, was a bit more moderate, but still accused the protesters of trying to “take the jobs away from people working in this city,” a statement that bears no resemblance to the movement’s actual goals.
And if you were listening to talking heads on CNBC, you learned that the protesters “let their freak flags fly,” and are “aligned with Lenin.”
The way to understand all of this is to realize that it’s part of a broader syndrome, in which wealthy Americans who benefit hugely from a system rigged in their favor react with hysteria to anyone who points out just how rigged the system is.
Last year, you may recall, a number of financial-industry barons went wild over very mild criticism from President Obama. They denounced Mr. Obama as being almost a socialist for endorsing the so-called Volcker rule, which would simply prohibit banks backed by federal guarantees from engaging in risky speculation. And as for their reaction to proposals to close a loophole that lets some of them pay remarkably low taxes — well, Stephen Schwarzman, chairman of the Blackstone Group, compared it to Hitler’s invasion of Poland.
And then there’s the campaign of character assassination against Elizabeth Warren, the financial reformer now running for the Senate in Massachusetts. Not long ago a YouTube video of Ms. Warren making an eloquent, down-to-earth case for taxes on the rich went viral. Nothing about what she said was radical — it was no more than a modern riff on Oliver Wendell Holmes’s famous dictum that “Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.”
But listening to the reliable defenders of the wealthy, you’d think that Ms. Warren was the second coming of Leon Trotsky. George Will declared that she has a “collectivist agenda,” that she believes that “individualism is a chimera.” And Rush Limbaugh called her “a parasite who hates her host. Willing to destroy the host while she sucks the life out of it.”
What’s going on here? The answer, surely, is that Wall Street’s Masters of the Universe realize, deep down, how morally indefensible their position is. They’re not John Galt; they’re not even Steve Jobs. They’re people who got rich by peddling complex financial schemes that, far from delivering clear benefits to the American people, helped push us into a crisis whose aftereffects continue to blight the lives of tens of millions of their fellow citizens.
Yet they have paid no price. Their institutions were bailed out by taxpayers, with few strings attached. They continue to benefit from explicit and implicit federal guarantees — basically, they’re still in a game of heads they win, tails taxpayers lose. And they benefit from tax loopholes that in many cases have people with multimillion-dollar incomes paying lower rates than middle-class families.
This special treatment can’t bear close scrutiny — and therefore, as they see it, there must be no close scrutiny. Anyone who points out the obvious, no matter how calmly and moderately, must be demonized and driven from the stage. In fact, the more reasonable and moderate a critic sounds, the more urgently he or she must be demonized, hence the frantic sliming of Elizabeth Warren.
So who’s really being un-American here? Not the protesters, who are simply trying to get their voices heard. No, the real extremists here are America’s oligarchs, who want to suppress any criticism of the sources of their wealth."